TY - JOUR
T1 - A new methodology for assessing health policy and systems research and analysis capacity in African universities
AU - Lê, Gillian
AU - Mirzoev, Tolib
AU - Orgill, Marsha
AU - Erasmus, Ermin
AU - Lehmann, Uta
AU - Okeyo, Stephen
AU - Goudge, Jane
AU - Maluka, Stephen
AU - Uzochukwu, Benjamin
AU - Aikins, Moses
AU - de Savigny, Don
AU - Tomson, Goran
AU - Gilson, Lucy
N1 - Funding Information:
The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Union Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under Grant Agreement Number 265482. Thanks are communicated to the following colleagues at CHEPSAA partners who engaged in ongoing discussions on the methodology and supported the conduct of the assessments but are not named in the authors’ list. These are Obinna Onwujekwe (HPRG-COMMUNEC), Irene Agyepong (SPH-UG), Pamela Atieno (TICH-GLUK), Peter Kamuzora and Adalgot Komba (IDS-USDM), Woldekidan Amde and Johann Cailhol (SOPH-UWC), Nonhlanhla Nxumalo (CHP-WITS), Andrew Green and Ricky Kalliecharan (UNIVLEEDS), Monica Nystrom and Kristina Jönsson (Karolinska Institutet).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2014 Lê et al.
PY - 2014
Y1 - 2014
N2 - Background: The importance of health policy and systems research and analysis (HPSR + A) has been increasingly recognised, but it is still unclear how most effectively to strengthen the capacity of the different organisations involved in this field. Universities are particularly crucial but the expansive literature on capacity development has little to offer the unique needs of HPSR + A activity within universities, and often overlooks the pivotal contribution of capacity assessments to capacity strengthening. Methods: The Consortium for Health Policy and Systems Analysis in Africa 2011-2015 designed and implemented a new framework for capacity assessment for HPSR + A within universities. The methodology is reported in detail. Results: Our reflections on developing and conducting the assessment generated four lessons for colleagues in the field. Notably, there are currently no published capacity assessment methodologies for HPSR + A that focus solely on universities - we report a first for the field to initiate the dialogue and exchange of experiences with others. Second, in HPSR + A, the unit of assessment can be a challenge, because HPSR + A groups within universities tend to overlap between academic departments and are embedded in different networks. Third, capacity assessment experience can itself be capacity strengthening, even when taking into account that doing such assessments require capacity. Conclusions: From our experience, we propose that future systematic assessments of HPSR + A capacity need to focus on both capacity assets and needs and assess capacity at individual, organisational, and systems levels, whilst taking into account the networked nature of HPSR + A activity. A genuine partnership process between evaluators and those participating in an assessment can improve the quality of assessment and uptake of results in capacity strengthening.
AB - Background: The importance of health policy and systems research and analysis (HPSR + A) has been increasingly recognised, but it is still unclear how most effectively to strengthen the capacity of the different organisations involved in this field. Universities are particularly crucial but the expansive literature on capacity development has little to offer the unique needs of HPSR + A activity within universities, and often overlooks the pivotal contribution of capacity assessments to capacity strengthening. Methods: The Consortium for Health Policy and Systems Analysis in Africa 2011-2015 designed and implemented a new framework for capacity assessment for HPSR + A within universities. The methodology is reported in detail. Results: Our reflections on developing and conducting the assessment generated four lessons for colleagues in the field. Notably, there are currently no published capacity assessment methodologies for HPSR + A that focus solely on universities - we report a first for the field to initiate the dialogue and exchange of experiences with others. Second, in HPSR + A, the unit of assessment can be a challenge, because HPSR + A groups within universities tend to overlap between academic departments and are embedded in different networks. Third, capacity assessment experience can itself be capacity strengthening, even when taking into account that doing such assessments require capacity. Conclusions: From our experience, we propose that future systematic assessments of HPSR + A capacity need to focus on both capacity assets and needs and assess capacity at individual, organisational, and systems levels, whilst taking into account the networked nature of HPSR + A activity. A genuine partnership process between evaluators and those participating in an assessment can improve the quality of assessment and uptake of results in capacity strengthening.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84925884684&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/1478-4505-12-59
DO - 10.1186/1478-4505-12-59
M3 - Article
C2 - 25296935
AN - SCOPUS:84925884684
SN - 1478-4505
VL - 12
JO - Health Research Policy and Systems
JF - Health Research Policy and Systems
IS - 1
M1 - 59
ER -