A refutação do absolutismo no pensamento político de Francisco Suarez

Leonor Durão Barroso

doi:10.14195/978‑989‑26‑1889‑0_15

A refutação do absolutismo no pensamento político de Francisco Suarez

Translated title of the contribution: The refutation of absolutism in the political thought of Francisco Suárez

Leonor Durão Barroso

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter

27 Downloads

Abstract

This article aims at understanding how the association of Suárez’s political thought with the defence of absolute gov‑ernment, from the broader analysis of Suárez’s thought as presenting an idea of limited government. Notwithstanding the fact that Suárez’s political thought was mainly developed in opposition to James I’s monarchical absolutist view, the interpretation of his thought herein suggested is not unani‑mously accepted. An aspect that appears to be decisive for the holding of the contrary view is Suárez’s idea that the translatio potestatis implies a total abrogation of power and, therefore, of the liberty of the people. The implications of such transfer must therefore be understood. Then, we shall answer the question of whether the king must ultimately be legibus solutus or, on the contrary, one can conceive in Suárez’s thought a government submitted to the laws of the community.

Translated title of the contribution	The refutation of absolutism in the political thought of Francisco Suárez
Original language	Portuguese
Title of host publication	Francisco Suárez
Subtitle of host publication	metaphysics, politics and ethics
Editors	Mário Santiago de Carvalho, Manuel Lázaro Pulido, Simone Guidi
Place of Publication	Coimbra
Publisher	Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra
Pages	401-428
Number of pages	28
ISBN (Electronic)	9789892618890
ISBN (Print)	9789892618883
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.14195/978‑989‑26‑1889‑0_15
Publication status	Published - Jun 2020

Publication series

Name	Ideia

Keywords

Power
Absolute government
James I
Abrogation
Freedom
Law
Community

Access to Document

10.14195/978‑989‑26‑1889‑0_15Licence: Unspecified

93688417Final published version, 404 KBLicence: Unspecified

http://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/46442Licence: Unspecified

CIEP: Research Centre of the Institute for Political Studies
Alves, A. A. (PI), Mateus, A. (Full Professor), Azevedo, A. (Student), Leitão, T. C. (Invited Assistant Professor), Duarte, A. R. (Other career/Public sector), Ramos, A. F. (Other career/Public sector), Garschagen, B. (Student), Pacatolo, C. (Student), Almeida, C. M. D. (Invited Assistant Professor), Cabrita, C. (Private Sector), Silva, D. (Scholarship holder), Correia, E. P. (Private Sector), Gonçalves, F. J. (Private Sector), Garcia, F. P. (Invited Associate Professor), Ribeiro, G. M. (Professor non-higher education), Varajidás, H. (Private Sector), Chelo, H. (Assistant Professor), Correia, I. (Private Sector), Gregório, I. (Research Assistant), Moreira, I. (Invited Assistant Professor), Câmara, J. B. (Student), Espada, J. C. (Full Professor), Coutinho, J. P. (Assistant Professor), André, J. G. (Assistant Professor), Moreira, J. M. (Full Professor), Castello Branco, J. T. (Invited Assistant Professor), Quintino, K. H. (Student), Pinto, L. V. (Other career/Public sector), Cruz, M. B. D. (Full Professor), Gambôa, E. (Invited Assistant Professor), Barroso, L. D. (Student), Franco, L. (Assistant Professor), Mendonça, M. (Assistant Professor), Morgado, M. (Assistant Professor), Dias, M. (Assistant Professor), Amado, N. M. (Private Sector), Sampaio, N. (Invited Assistant Professor), Samões, O. (Assistant Professor), Ferro, P. (Private Sector), Moreira, P. (Private Sector), Duque, R. (Invited Assistant Professor), Brito, R. (Assistant Teacher), Mangerona, S. (Private Sector), Cajarabille, V. (Other career/Public sector), Hasselberger, W. (Assistant Professor) & Ribeiro, S. (Invited Assistant Professor)
1/01/20 → 31/12/25
Project: Research

Cite this

@inbook{6701c3c1475c475cb84398c344c7eb8c,

title = "A refuta{\c c}{\~a}o do absolutismo no pensamento pol{\'i}tico de Francisco Suarez",

abstract = "This article aims at understanding how the association of Su{\'a}rez{\textquoteright}s political thought with the defence of absolute gov‑ernment, from the broader analysis of Su{\'a}rez{\textquoteright}s thought as presenting an idea of limited government. Notwithstanding the fact that Su{\'a}rez{\textquoteright}s political thought was mainly developed in opposition to James I{\textquoteright}s monarchical absolutist view, the interpretation of his thought herein suggested is not unani‑mously accepted. An aspect that appears to be decisive for the holding of the contrary view is Su{\'a}rez{\textquoteright}s idea that the translatio potestatis implies a total abrogation of power and, therefore, of the liberty of the people. The implications of such transfer must therefore be understood. Then, we shall answer the question of whether the king must ultimately be legibus solutus or, on the contrary, one can conceive in Su{\'a}rez{\textquoteright}s thought a government submitted to the laws of the community.",

keywords = "Power, Absolute government, James I, Abrogation, Freedom, Law, Community",

author = "Barroso, \{Leonor Dur{\~a}o\}",

year = "2020",

month = jun,

doi = "10.14195/978‑989‑26‑1889‑0\_15",

language = "Portuguese",

isbn = "9789892618883",

series = "Ideia",

publisher = "Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra",

pages = "401--428",

editor = "Carvalho, \{M{\'a}rio Santiago de\} and Pulido, \{Manuel L{\'a}zaro\} and Simone Guidi",

booktitle = "Francisco Su{\'a}rez",

address = "Portugal",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - A refutação do absolutismo no pensamento político de Francisco Suarez

AU - Barroso, Leonor Durão

PY - 2020/6

Y1 - 2020/6

N2 - This article aims at understanding how the association of Suárez’s political thought with the defence of absolute gov‑ernment, from the broader analysis of Suárez’s thought as presenting an idea of limited government. Notwithstanding the fact that Suárez’s political thought was mainly developed in opposition to James I’s monarchical absolutist view, the interpretation of his thought herein suggested is not unani‑mously accepted. An aspect that appears to be decisive for the holding of the contrary view is Suárez’s idea that the translatio potestatis implies a total abrogation of power and, therefore, of the liberty of the people. The implications of such transfer must therefore be understood. Then, we shall answer the question of whether the king must ultimately be legibus solutus or, on the contrary, one can conceive in Suárez’s thought a government submitted to the laws of the community.

AB - This article aims at understanding how the association of Suárez’s political thought with the defence of absolute gov‑ernment, from the broader analysis of Suárez’s thought as presenting an idea of limited government. Notwithstanding the fact that Suárez’s political thought was mainly developed in opposition to James I’s monarchical absolutist view, the interpretation of his thought herein suggested is not unani‑mously accepted. An aspect that appears to be decisive for the holding of the contrary view is Suárez’s idea that the translatio potestatis implies a total abrogation of power and, therefore, of the liberty of the people. The implications of such transfer must therefore be understood. Then, we shall answer the question of whether the king must ultimately be legibus solutus or, on the contrary, one can conceive in Suárez’s thought a government submitted to the laws of the community.

KW - Power

KW - Absolute government

KW - James I

KW - Abrogation

KW - Freedom

KW - Law

KW - Community

U2 - 10.14195/978‑989‑26‑1889‑0_15

DO - 10.14195/978‑989‑26‑1889‑0_15

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9789892618883

T3 - Ideia

SP - 401

EP - 428

BT - Francisco Suárez

A2 - Carvalho, Mário Santiago de

A2 - Pulido, Manuel Lázaro

A2 - Guidi, Simone

PB - Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra

CY - Coimbra

ER -

A refutação do absolutismo no pensamento político de Francisco Suarez

Abstract

Publication series

Keywords

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Projects

CIEP: Research Centre of the Institute for Political Studies

Cite this