An empirical analysis of constitutional review voting in the polish constitutional tribunal, 2003–2014

Jarosław Kantorowicz, Nuno Garoupa*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Different theories have been developed, mainly in the context of the United States, to explain judicial decision-making. In this respect, there is an important ongoing debate over whether judges are guided by the law or by personal ideology. The analysis of the decision-making in the Polish Constitutional Tribunal seems to support the existence of some party alignment. It is to say that judicial behavior is influenced by the ideology, either because judges’ preferences coincide with the interests of a specific party or because the judges are incentivized to show their loyalty to a party. Party alignment exists but subject to institutional influences. These results are in line with previous findings for other constitutional courts in Europe.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)66-92
Number of pages27
JournalConstitutional Political Economy
Volume27
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2016

Keywords

  • Constitutional review
  • Judicial behavior
  • Poland

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'An empirical analysis of constitutional review voting in the polish constitutional tribunal, 2003–2014'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this