TY - JOUR
T1 - Assessment of wave front activation duration and speed across the right ventricular outflow tract using electrocardiographic imaging as predictors of the origin of the premature ventricular contractions
T2 - a validation study
AU - Parreira, Leonor
AU - Carmo, Pedro
AU - Marinheiro, Rita
AU - Mesquita, Dinis
AU - Chmelevsky, Mikhail
AU - Ferreira, António
AU - Marques, Lia
AU - Pinho, Joana
AU - Chambel, Duarte
AU - Nunes, Silvia
AU - Amador, Pedro
AU - Gonçalves, Pedro
AU - Marques, Hugo
AU - Caria, Rui
AU - Adragão, Pedro
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was in part funded by a grant from the Hospital Luz Lisbon as project NoSA-APVC (Reference LH.INV.F2019005 ) under the initiative “Luz Investigação.”
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2022/7/1
Y1 - 2022/7/1
N2 - Aims: Evaluate right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) activation duration (AD) and speed, invasively and with the electrocardiographic imaging (ECGI), as predictors of the origin of the PVCs, validating the ECGI. Methods: 18 consecutive patients, 8 males, median age 55 (35–63) years that underwent ablation of PVCs with inferior axis and had ECGI performed before ablation. Isochronal activation maps of the RVOT in PVC were obtained with the ECGI and invasively. Total RVOT AD was measured as the time between earliest and latest activated region, and propagation speed by measuring the area of the first 10 ms of activation. Cut-off values for AD, activation speed and number of 10 ms isochrones to predict the origin of the PVCs, were obtained with the ROC curve analysis. Agreement between methods was done with Pearson correlation test and Bland-Altman plot. Results: PVCs originated from the RVOT in 11 (61%) patients. The stronger predictor of PVC origin was the AD. The median AD in PVCs from RVOT was significantly longer than from outside the RVOT, both with ECGI and invasively, respectively 62 (58–73) vs 37 (33–40) ms, p < 0.0001 and 68 (60–75) vs 35 (29–41) ms, p < 0.0001. Agreement between the two methods was good (r = 0.864, p < 0.0001). The cut-off value of 43 ms for AD measured with ECGI predicted the origin of the PVCs with a sensitivity and specificity of 100%. Conclusions: We found good agreement between ECGI and invasive map. The AD measured with ECGI was the best predictor of the origin of the PVCs.
AB - Aims: Evaluate right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) activation duration (AD) and speed, invasively and with the electrocardiographic imaging (ECGI), as predictors of the origin of the PVCs, validating the ECGI. Methods: 18 consecutive patients, 8 males, median age 55 (35–63) years that underwent ablation of PVCs with inferior axis and had ECGI performed before ablation. Isochronal activation maps of the RVOT in PVC were obtained with the ECGI and invasively. Total RVOT AD was measured as the time between earliest and latest activated region, and propagation speed by measuring the area of the first 10 ms of activation. Cut-off values for AD, activation speed and number of 10 ms isochrones to predict the origin of the PVCs, were obtained with the ROC curve analysis. Agreement between methods was done with Pearson correlation test and Bland-Altman plot. Results: PVCs originated from the RVOT in 11 (61%) patients. The stronger predictor of PVC origin was the AD. The median AD in PVCs from RVOT was significantly longer than from outside the RVOT, both with ECGI and invasively, respectively 62 (58–73) vs 37 (33–40) ms, p < 0.0001 and 68 (60–75) vs 35 (29–41) ms, p < 0.0001. Agreement between the two methods was good (r = 0.864, p < 0.0001). The cut-off value of 43 ms for AD measured with ECGI predicted the origin of the PVCs with a sensitivity and specificity of 100%. Conclusions: We found good agreement between ECGI and invasive map. The AD measured with ECGI was the best predictor of the origin of the PVCs.
KW - Activation duration
KW - Activation speed
KW - Catheter ablation
KW - ECGI
KW - Non-invasive mapping
KW - Outflow tract
KW - Premature ventricular contractions
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85131396811&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2022.05.005
DO - 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2022.05.005
M3 - Article
C2 - 35667215
AN - SCOPUS:85131396811
SN - 0022-0736
VL - 73
SP - 68
EP - 75
JO - Journal of Electrocardiology
JF - Journal of Electrocardiology
ER -