Audit quality and the cost of debt in private firms: evidence from the Brazilian sugarcane industry

Aviner Augusto Silva Manoel*, Marcelo Botelho da Costa Moraes, David Ferreira Lopes Santos, Gabriel Pereira Pündrich

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Downloads

Abstract

Evidence is mixed regarding the economic benefits achieved by companies hiring large firms to audit their financial statements. The studies approaching this theme concentrate mostly on public companies in developed markets, while the effect on private firms in emerging markets is still an open question. This research explores this gap by analyzing whether private firms in the Brazilian sugarcane industry audited by a Big 4 have a lower cost of debt than those audited by a non-Big 4. For that, a unique, hand-collected, dataset was used. This paper contributes to the literature by providing evidence of the role of audit institutions in an environment lacking studies on private firms’ financial reports, especially in emerging economies. The empirical analysis does not indicate that the cost of debt is negatively influenced by the verification of financial statements by a high-quality auditor. Banks and credit unions, as the primary funding sources of the industry, condition the cost of debt reduction to the levels of tangibility, leverage, and profitability. We also contribute to the literature by demonstrating that lenders may have other soft information sources, obtained through banking relationship, which may substitute higher-quality auditor.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)21-36
Number of pages16
JournalInternational Food and Agribusiness Management Review
Volume25
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2022
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Agribusiness
  • Big 4 auditor
  • Audit
  • Emerging markets

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Audit quality and the cost of debt in private firms: evidence from the Brazilian sugarcane industry'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this