Abstract
Hierarchy is habitually presented as the right organizational infrastructure through which to deploy and achieve strategy. We analyze the strategy process, specifically the strategy/execution debate, from the perspective of hierarchy, and contrast the hierarchical mode - where top management dominates by separating strategy/formulation and execution - with three alternative modes where the power circuits of strategy extend beyond the managerial elite and are shared by several strategic agents. These three possibilities are: (1) the porous hierarchical mode, in which the hierarchs/higher-ups transfer part of the power for shaping and informing the strategy to the base of the organization; (2) the distributed mode, in which the hierarchs have no direct influence but rather indirect moral authority over execution, and (3) the strategy as simple rules mode, in which strategy/execution is taken as a single iterative process where strategy evolves on the basis of a minimal structure that facilitates strategic interaction and prevents hierarchical control from stifling adaptation.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 491-503 |
Number of pages | 13 |
Journal | European Management Journal |
Volume | 29 |
Issue number | 6 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Dec 2011 |
Keywords
- Execution
- Hierarchy
- Simple rules
- Strategy