Brexit as a question of political rationality: hard choices for the UK, lessons for EU sustainability

Annette Bongardt, Francisco Torres

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Brexit can be viewed as a logical consequence and culmination of the UK harbouring ever more divergent preferences from the EU. Such divergence became incompatible and arguably unsustainable when EU integration deepened to EMU and the UK was not prepared to go along with the requirements to make it function. Having triggered the EU’s exit clause to disentangle itself and withdraw from the EU, the UK has found it unpalatable that, even as a third country, it still faces the same dilemma as an EU member: it has to make a choice as to the degree of proximity to the EU’s internal market, by far its largest market, as any preferential trade agreement faces some trade-off between sovereignty and the available economic benefits. As for the EU, the UK’s exit has on the one hand put in sharp focus the limits of differentiated integration and the need to face the question of the Union’s optimum size, but also shed light on opportunities for the EU and important lessons for to the sustainability of the club.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationThe politics and economics of Brexit
EditorsAnnette Bongardt, Leila Simona Talani, Francisco Torres
PublisherEdward Elgar Publishing Ltd.
Chapter2
Pages10-37
Number of pages28
Edition1
ISBN (Electronic)9781788977975
ISBN (Print)9781788977968
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 31 Jul 2020

Publication series

NameSocial and Political Science 2020
PublisherEdward Elgar Publishing, Ltd.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Brexit as a question of political rationality: hard choices for the UK, lessons for EU sustainability'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this