TY - JOUR
T1 - Cell-based internal standard for qPCR determinations of antibiotic resistance indicators in environmental water samples
AU - Rocha, Jaqueline
AU - Manaia, Célia M.
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of the staff who provided the wastewater samples from hospital and treatment plants; the colleagues R. Lopes and O. Nunes from Laboratório de Engenharia de Processos, Ambiente, Biotecnologia e Energia, Faculdade de Engenharia, Universidade do Porto who kindly provided the Gulosibacter molinativorax ON4 T strain for this study; the control DNA extraction operators T. Fernandes and C. Ferreira and Gianuário. Fortunato for supplying the qPCR protocols for rpoB, ecf, bla IMP and bla VIM genes. The work was possible thanks to the support of the host research Centre funded by the FCT project UID/Multi/50016/2019.
Funding Information:
The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of the staff who provided the wastewater samples from hospital and treatment plants; the colleagues R. Lopes and O. Nunes from Laborat?rio de Engenharia de Processos, Ambiente, Biotecnologia e Energia, Faculdade de Engenharia, Universidade do Porto who kindly provided the Gulosibacter molinativorax ON4T strain for this study; the control DNA extraction operators T. Fernandes and C. Ferreira and Gianu?rio. Fortunato for supplying the qPCR protocols for rpoB, ecf, blaIMP and blaVIM genes. The work was possible thanks to the support of the host research Centre funded by the FCT project UID/Multi/50016/2019. This work was supported by Funda??o para a Ci?ncia e Tecnologia WaterJPI/0001/2013 STARE ? ?Stopping Antibiotic Resistance Evolution? and by European Regional Development Fund (FEDER), through the North Regional Operational Program (North PO), under the project DEPCAT: Demonstration of new equipment involving integrated catalytic processes for the treatment of organic pollutants and disinfection of waters (NORTE-01-0247-FEDER-033330). J. Rocha was supported by the International PhD Programme in Biotechnology ? BIOTECH.DOC, NORTE-08-5369-FSE-000007.
Funding Information:
This work was supported by Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia WaterJPI/0001/2013 STARE – “Stopping Antibiotic Resistance Evolution” and by European Regional Development Fund ( FEDER ), through the North Regional Operational Program (North PO), under the project DEPCAT: Demonstration of new equipment involving integrated catalytic processes for the treatment of organic pollutants and disinfection of waters (NORTE-01-0247-FEDER-033330). J. Rocha was supported by the International PhD Programme in Biotechnology – BIOTECH.DOC, NORTE-08-5369-FSE-000007.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2020/6
Y1 - 2020/6
N2 - Quantitative PCR (qPCR) has been used to quantify antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) in water, wastewater, soil, sediment and tissue samples. Concerns regarding the comparability of data obtained in different laboratories has been a major bottleneck to incentivize the compilation of publicly available of ARGs quantifications gathered from different reports. In this study, the influence of the DNA extraction kits (NZY Tissue gDNA Isolation kit or DNeasy PowerWater kit) and of the operator on the DNA extraction yield and on qPCR genes quantification was assessed. Since in wastewater and water samples the matrix effect can affect the DNA recovery and, therefore, gene quantification, an internal standard, consisting in a cloned gene not found in environmental samples, was tested. The aim was to assess how qPCR determinations in wastewater and water samples can be affected by the matrix effect. The results show that the DNA extraction operator did not significantly influence DNA yield. The use of distinct kits resulted in qPCR gene quantifications that did not differ in more than 1 log-unit mL−1. The matrix effect, assessed based on the use of an internal standard, was associated with an underestimation that ranged 0.1–0.9 log gene copy number mL−1 of sample, irrespective of the water type. The reliability on the use of a DNA extraction kit that costs about 3 times less than the most commonly used can be an incentive for the use of DNA based analyses of ARGs in environmental waters. Moreover, the fact that both the DNA extraction operator and the reduced matrix effect have little influence on the final results, are good news, encouraging the compilation of data produced in distinct laboratories. Nevertheless, harmonization efforts are still necessary to minimize bias that may be due associated with other conditions, such as equipment.
AB - Quantitative PCR (qPCR) has been used to quantify antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) in water, wastewater, soil, sediment and tissue samples. Concerns regarding the comparability of data obtained in different laboratories has been a major bottleneck to incentivize the compilation of publicly available of ARGs quantifications gathered from different reports. In this study, the influence of the DNA extraction kits (NZY Tissue gDNA Isolation kit or DNeasy PowerWater kit) and of the operator on the DNA extraction yield and on qPCR genes quantification was assessed. Since in wastewater and water samples the matrix effect can affect the DNA recovery and, therefore, gene quantification, an internal standard, consisting in a cloned gene not found in environmental samples, was tested. The aim was to assess how qPCR determinations in wastewater and water samples can be affected by the matrix effect. The results show that the DNA extraction operator did not significantly influence DNA yield. The use of distinct kits resulted in qPCR gene quantifications that did not differ in more than 1 log-unit mL−1. The matrix effect, assessed based on the use of an internal standard, was associated with an underestimation that ranged 0.1–0.9 log gene copy number mL−1 of sample, irrespective of the water type. The reliability on the use of a DNA extraction kit that costs about 3 times less than the most commonly used can be an incentive for the use of DNA based analyses of ARGs in environmental waters. Moreover, the fact that both the DNA extraction operator and the reduced matrix effect have little influence on the final results, are good news, encouraging the compilation of data produced in distinct laboratories. Nevertheless, harmonization efforts are still necessary to minimize bias that may be due associated with other conditions, such as equipment.
KW - DNA extraction
KW - Internal standard
KW - Matrix effect
KW - Quantitative PCR
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85079113386&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106194
DO - 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106194
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85079113386
SN - 1470-160X
VL - 113
JO - Ecological Indicators
JF - Ecological Indicators
M1 - 106194
ER -