Classical surplus theory and heterodox economics

Nuno Ornelas Martins*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

It has recently been suggested that heterodox economics can benefit from an engagement with classical surplus theory. However, caution is often recommended due to the ideological concepts that are embedded in classical political economy. This article argues that many of the ideological concepts that are often attributed to classical political economy are actually not part of classical political economy, but rather of a "vulgar" form of political economy, a project that emerged after Ricardo. This vulgar project, often termed as "Ricardian economics," is often mistakenly taken to be a development of classical political economy, but it is actually a rupture with the classical political economy of Petty, Smith, and Ricardo, as Marx, and later Sraffa, argued. Once this is acknowledged, the relationship between classical political economy and heterodox economics becomes clearer.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1205-1231
Number of pages27
JournalAmerican Journal of Economics and Sociology
Volume72
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2013

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Classical surplus theory and heterodox economics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this