Abstract
Quality of care for older surgical in-patients, often suffering from pre-existing co-morbidity, requires hospital organiza- tion fostering the cooperation of multi-disciplinary teams. Co-management programmes have proved to be the most adequate for this purpose. However, the costs involved in this approach warrant careful patient selection. Ascertaining surgical risk in individual patients is a pre-re- quisite for quality and outcome control. The patient’s specific characteristics, the surgical procedure itself and the institu- tional environment are the three main groups of inputs for a comprehensive selection and decision-making framework. Comparative effectiveness research is required to gather clinical evidence to support the rational use of collaborative and differentiated management of selected patients in mo- dern hospital settings. A literature-based review article was done that included an overview of outcomes research and outcome measures.
| Translated title of the contribution | Co-management ou responsabilidade partilhada entre a medicina interna e as especialidades cirúrgicas: a identificação dos doentes de alto risco |
|---|---|
| Original language | English |
| Pages (from-to) | 44-47 |
| Number of pages | 4 |
| Journal | Medicina Interna |
| Volume | 24 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 30 Mar 2017 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Comparative effectiveness research
- Decision making
- Hospitalists
- Internal medicine
- Patient care team/ organization & administration
- Postoperative complications
- Surgical procedures, Operative
- Preoperative care
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Co-management between internal medicine and surgical specialities: the identification of the high risk patient'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver