Communication and decision making in neonatal intensive care: why narrative medicine matters

Carmen Carvalho, Ana Vale, Susana Magalhães

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)
1 Downloads

Abstract

Objective: This paper aims to analyse parents’ and health professionals’ discourse, regarding four main areas: (1) the experience of care; (2) communication among all stakeholders; (3) ethical issues; (4) and ethical decision-making. Methodology: The authors collected 62 narratives from health professionals and parents whose newborns have been hospitalized for at least 15 days in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). We carried out a qualitative content analysis with the support of NVivo software version 12 Pro. Results: The feelings/emotions are present in a high percentage of narratives (mostly negative ones). Parents´ learning emphasizes coping strategies. Most narratives focus on communicational aspects. Decision-making is referred to in almost half of the narratives. The ethical issues and questions mentioned are mainly related to decision-making. Conclusion: The present study emphasizes narrative relevance in the alignment of parents´ and health professionals´ perspectives to promote therapeutic relationships.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)104-121
Number of pages18
JournalNew Trends in Qualitative Research
Volume1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 23 Jul 2020

Keywords

  • Communication
  • Decision-making
  • Narrative medicine
  • Neonatal intensive care

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Communication and decision making in neonatal intensive care: why narrative medicine matters'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this