Comparison of off-screen visualization techniques with representation of relevance on mobile devices

Tiago Goncalves*, Ana Paula Afonso, Maria Beatriz Carmo, Paulo Pombinho

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaperpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

When exploring map information on mobile devices, relevant points of interest (POIs) are often located off-screen. Despite the existence of several techniques that allow the exploration of the surrounding areas, none represents the POIs' relevance. Furthermore, when the number of POIs increases, the visualization of the information often becomes unintelligible. This paper presents: our approach to enhancing off-screen visualization techniques with the representation of relevance and cluttering reduction; and a comparative study, using three modified techniques with the proposed approach, HaloDot, Scaled Arrows and Mini-Map. We concluded that while Scaled Arrows has advantages when analysing the distance to the most relevant objects, the Mini-Map provides better information about the distribution of the POIs, helping users on navigational tasks. Also, the choice of an off-screen technique depends, at least, on two factors: number and geographic distribution of POIs.
Original languageEnglish
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013
Externally publishedYes
Event27th International British Computer Society Human Computer Interaction Conference: The Internet of Things, HCI 2013 - London, United Kingdom
Duration: 9 Sept 201313 Sept 2013

Conference

Conference27th International British Computer Society Human Computer Interaction Conference: The Internet of Things, HCI 2013
Country/TerritoryUnited Kingdom
CityLondon
Period9/09/1313/09/13

Keywords

  • Halo
  • Mobile devices
  • Off-screen visualization
  • Overview+detail
  • Relevance
  • Scaled arrows
  • User evaluation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of off-screen visualization techniques with representation of relevance on mobile devices'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this