Coronary artery bypass grafting versus percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with non–ST-elevation myocardial infarction and left main or multivessel coronary disease

Pedro Freitas*, Márcio Madeira, Luís Raposo, Sérgio Madeira, João Brito, Catarina Brízido, Francisco Gama, Nélson Vale, Sara Ranchordás, Pedro Magro, Ana Braga, Pedro de Araújo Gonçalves, Henrique Mesquita Gabriel, Tiago Nolasco, Sérgio Boshoff, Marta Marques, Luís Bruges, José Calquinha, Miguel Sousa-Uva, Miguel AbecasisManuel Almeida, José Pedro Neves, Miguel Mendes

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Current recommendations on the optimal revascularization strategy in Non–ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) with left main (LM) or multivessel coronary disease (MVD) are based upon randomized clinical trials conducted in stable coronary artery disease. In a real-world contemporary observational registry, we compared the long-term outcome of NSTEMI patients with LM/MVD (n = 1,104) submitted to coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), or optimized medical therapy (OMT). The primary end point was 5-year all-cause mortality. Results were assessed in the entire population (CABG 289, PCI 399, and OMT 416) and in a propensity score-matched cohort of CABG (n = 159) and PCI (n = 159). Crude 5-year mortality rates in CABG and PCI were 25.3% versus 29.6%, respectively (unadjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.2; 95% confidence intervals [CI] 0.9 to 1.6; p = 0.212); OMT, however, was associated with a twofold higher risk of mortality when compared with any revascularization strategy (unadjusted HR 2.0; 95% CI 1.7 to 2.5; p < 0.001). After propensity score-matching and multivariate analysis, there was a trend toward a higher incidence of the primary end point in patients who underwent PCI versus CABG (31% vs 21%; adjusted HR 1.52; 95% CI 0.93 to 2.50; p = 0.094). This was a consistent finding over subgroups deemed clinically relevant, such as in patients with LM or proximal left anterior descending disease, SYNergy between percutaneous coronary intervention with TAXus ≥23 and left ventricle ejection fraction <40%. In conclusion, in a real-world cohort of NSTEMI patients with LM/MVD, those selected for OMT had a dire outcome. Although adjusted 5-year mortality was statistically similar between revascularization strategies, there was a trend favoring CABG, which might be the preferred option in LM, proximal LAD, SYNergy between percutaneous coronary intervention with TAXus ≥23, and left ventricle ejection fraction <40% subgroups.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)717-724
Number of pages8
JournalThe American journal of cardiology
Volume123
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2019
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Coronary artery bypass grafting versus percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with non–ST-elevation myocardial infarction and left main or multivessel coronary disease'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this