Cristologismo escotista vs. cristocentrismo bonaventuriano: esquemas filosóficos franciscanos subyacentes. En torno a la cuestión del objeto de la teología

Translated title of the contribution: Scotist Christologism vs. Bonaventurian christocentrism: underlying Franciscan philosophical schemes. Around the question of the object of theology

Manuel Lázaro Pulido*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In the present article, we intend to show the importance of the conception of Christ in the development of philosophy and how it relates to the way metaphysics is structurally constructed: in a geometrical-reductive way (Bonaventure) or in a deductive way (Duns Scotus). To do this, we focus on the critique that the Subtle makes of the Seraphic in relation to the question about the subject of theology: Christ (Bonaventure), God (Duns Scotus). Behind these questions there is a different way of seeing the primacy of Christ: in a Christocentric (Bonaventure) or Christological (Duns Scotus) construction.
Translated title of the contributionScotist Christologism vs. Bonaventurian christocentrism: underlying Franciscan philosophical schemes. Around the question of the object of theology
Original languageSpanish
Pages (from-to)375-404
Number of pages30
JournalCarthaginensia
Volume36
Issue number70
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2020
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Christocentrism
  • Christology
  • Duns Scotus
  • Metaphysics
  • Ontology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Scotist Christologism vs. Bonaventurian christocentrism: underlying Franciscan philosophical schemes. Around the question of the object of theology'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this