Abstract
We examine the factors that influence borrower’s choice between structured finance (SF) and straight debt finance (SDF). Using a sample of 12,075 Western European loans and bonds issued between 2000 and 2011, we find that borrowers choose SF when they seek long-term financing and funding cost reduction. Our results document that floatation costs, information asymmetry, and renegotiation and liquidation risks affect non-financial firms’ financing decisions. We also find that banks choose securitization to raise relatively large amounts of debt and improve economic performance. Our overall findings support hypotheses of SF as mechanism for asymmetric information problem and principal-agent conflict reduction.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Number of pages | 50 |
| Publication status | Published - 10 Mar 2017 |
Publication series
| Name | SSRN - Social Sciences Research Network |
|---|
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
Keywords
- Debt financing choice
- Security design
- loan and bond pricing
- Structured finance
- Project finance
- Asset securitization
- Corporate bonds
- Financial crisis
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Debt financing choices: theory and evidence from Europe'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver