Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Desconstruir notícias e estereótipos: reflexões feministas sobre as instâncias da produção, da circulação e da recepção dos discursos jornalísticos

Translated title of the contribution: Deconstructing news and stereotypes: feminist reflections on the production, circulation and reception instances of journalistic discourses

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article aims to (re)think the processes of production, circulation and reception of news content as a critical resource in the construction of gender and sexuality identities. We analyzed three news as object of study, through the lens of the Critical Feminist Discourse Analysis (Lazar, 2007), as well as the readings and discussions about these texts collected during the Think tank held at the "International Colloquium and Summer School Gender, Communication and Activisms", at the University of Coimbra. This is an exploratory research and uses the deconstruction of news as a strategy to reflect on the naturalization of gender and sexuality stereotypes present in journalistic publications. Through this exploratory research, which uses the deconstruction of news as a strategy to reflect on the gender naturalization and sexuality stereotypes present in journalistic publications, we identified the systematic symbolic annihilation of women, in the terms proposed by Gaye Tchuman (2009), in/from the news.
Translated title of the contributionDeconstructing news and stereotypes: feminist reflections on the production, circulation and reception instances of journalistic discourses
Original languageSpanish
Pages (from-to)165-178
Number of pages14
JournalEstudios Sobre el Mensaje Periodistico
Volume28
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 4 Feb 2022
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Journalism
  • Literacy
  • News
  • Stereotypes
  • Think tank

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Deconstructing news and stereotypes: feminist reflections on the production, circulation and reception instances of journalistic discourses'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this