Abstract
Following a brief introductory presentation of the origins of the judiciary portrait (front/profile) in the nineteenth century, within the wider context of the criminal identification system known as "Bertillonage", the first article section is dedicated to the demonstration of a series of performative features of this kind of photograph, on many levels, and considering recent theories around the notion of performativity. The second part of this article argues that, as a performative construct, the judiciary portrait acquires renowned dimension and relevance, especially by means of transvisuality and ‘remediation’ (Bolter and Grusin, 2000), resulting in its autonomization as a rhetorical model in contemporary media
| Translated title of the contribution | Performative dimentions of mugshots: elaboration, reception - and rethorical autonomy |
|---|---|
| Original language | Portuguese |
| Pages (from-to) | 125-158 |
| Number of pages | 33 |
| Journal | Comunicação & Cultura |
| Issue number | 14 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2012 |
Keywords
- Judiciary portrait
- Criminal identification
- Performaticity
- Remediation
- Rhetoric model
- Autonomy
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Performative dimentions of mugshots: elaboration, reception - and rethorical autonomy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver