Abstract
The journalist’s protection under Art. 10 ECHR cannot automatically be removed by virtue of a source’s own conduct. Source protection applies even when a source’s identity is known. Having regard to the importance of the protection of journalistic sources for press freedom in a democratic society and the potentially chilling effect an order of source disclosure has on the exercise of that freedom, a judicial order aimed to obtain the disclosure of the journalist’s source, even when the source revealed freely this information, cannot be compatible with Art. 10 of the Convention unless it is justified by an overriding requirement in the public interest.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 386-393 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | Media laws - Rivista di diritto dei media |
| Issue number | 3 |
| Publication status | Published - 24 Oct 2018 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- Freedom of expression
- European court on human rights
- European convention on human rights
- Journalistic sources
- Press freedom
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Disclosure of journalistic sources already revealed. The case Becker v. Norway'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver