Doing the Right Thing or Doing the Thing Right: Implications of Participant Withdrawal

Andrea Stevenson Thorpe*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article discusses implications of participant withdrawal for inductive research. I describe and analyze how a third of my participants withdrew from a grounded theory study. I position my example, ensuing issues, and potential solutions as reflective of inductive methodologies as a whole. The crux of the problem is the disruption inflicted by withdrawal on inductive processes of generating knowledge. I examine the subsequent methodological and ethical issues in trying to determine the best course of action following withdrawal. I suggest three potential options for researchers: Continuing the study with partial data, continuing the study with all data, and discontinuing the study. Motivated by my experience, and wider theoretical considerations, I present several suggestions and questions, with the aim of supporting researchers in determining the best course of action for their individual field circumstances.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)255-277
Number of pages23
JournalOrganizational Research Methods
Volume17
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 12 Jul 2014
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • ethics in research
  • grounded theory
  • interviewing
  • qualitative research

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Doing the Right Thing or Doing the Thing Right: Implications of Participant Withdrawal'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this