Emotion regulation and the quality of social interaction: does the ability to evaluate emotional situations and identify effective responses matter?

Paulo N. Lopes*, John B. Nezlek, Natalio Extremera, Janine Hertel, Pablo Fernández-Berrocal, Astrid Schütz, Peter Salovey

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

90 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We examined self and friends' ratings of social relationship quality and everyday social interactions in 3 studies involving 544 college students in Germany, Spain, and the United States. Scores on a situational judgment test measuring strategic emotion regulation ability (SERA) were negatively related to conflict with others. SERA was more consistently and strongly related to conflict with others than to the positive dimension of relationship quality (support, companionship, and nurturance). The relationship between SERA and conflict was generally not mediated by trait positive or negative affect, and it remained significant or marginally significant controlling for the Big Five personality traits. These findings highlight the importance of the ability to evaluate emotional situations and identify effective responses to these in interpersonal emotion regulation. Furthermore, they suggest that situational judgment and flexible response selection may help people to manage conflicts more than to bond with others.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)429-467
Number of pages39
JournalJournal of Personality
Volume79
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2011

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Emotion regulation and the quality of social interaction: does the ability to evaluate emotional situations and identify effective responses matter?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this