Emotional impact and perceived effectiveness of text-only versus graphic health warning tobacco labels on adolescents

Pedro Margalhos, Francisco Esteves, Jaime Vila, Patrícia Arriaga*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The study of smoking in adolescence is of major importance as nicotine dependence often begins in younger groups. Tobacco health warnings have been introduced to inform people of the negative consequences of smoking. This study assessed the emotions and perceived effectiveness of two formats of tobacco warnings on adolescents: Text-only versus graphic warning labels. In addition, we analyzed how emotions predicted their perceived effectiveness. In a cross-sectional study, 413 adolescents (131 smokers, 282 non-smokers) between 13-20 years of age rated their emotions (valence and arousal) and perceived effectiveness towards a set of tobacco warnings. Results showed that graphic warnings evoked higher arousal than text-only warning labels (p =.038). Most of the warning labels also evoked unpleasantness with smokers reporting higher unpleasantness regarding text-only warnings compared to non-smokers (p =.002). In contrast, perceived effectiveness of the warnings was lower in smokers than in non-smokers (p =.029). Finally, high arousal and being a non-smoker explained 14% of the variance of perceiving the warnings more effective. Given the role that warnings may play in increasing health awareness, these findings highlight how smoking status and emotions are important predictors of the way adolescents consider tobacco health labels to be effective.
Original languageEnglish
JournalSpanish Journal of Psychology
Volume22
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 17 Apr 2019
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Adolescents
  • Emotions
  • Perceived effectiveness
  • Tobacco health labels

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Emotional impact and perceived effectiveness of text-only versus graphic health warning tobacco labels on adolescents'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this