TY - JOUR
T1 - Employee adaptive and proactive service recovery
T2 - a configurational perspective
AU - Silva, Graca Miranda
AU - Coelho, Filipe
AU - Lages, Cristiana R.
AU - Reis, Marta
N1 - Funding Information:
Graca Miranda Silva is grateful to FCT (Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, Lisboa, Portugal) National Funds under the project name UID/SOC/04521/2019. Filipe Coelho has been supported by national funds through FCT, I.P. Project UIDB/05037/2020.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, Emerald Publishing Limited.
PY - 2020/7/20
Y1 - 2020/7/20
N2 - Purpose: This study aims to investigate the configurations that drive employee service recovery. Rather than analyzing the net effects of individual antecedents of service recovery, which is the common approach in the literature, this study uses a configurational approach to investigate how five antecedents (customer service orientation, rewards, teamwork, empowerment and customer service training) combine to yield employee adaptive and proactive service recovery behaviors. Design/methodology/approach: The study collects responses from 90 frontline employees through an online survey. Building on configurational theory, the authors developed and empirically validated four research propositions by using a fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis. Findings: Three equifinal configurations of managerial practices result in either employee proactive or adaptive service recovery behaviors. Two of these three configurations result in both adaptive and proactive behaviors. In addition, the findings show that two out of the three configurations that lead to proactive behavior in service recovery also lead to the simultaneous existence of proactive and adaptive behaviors in service recovery. None of the sufficient configurations require the presence of all managerial practices. These results underscore that managers do not have to act on every single managerial intervention area to promote service recovery. Research limitations/implications: The study advances the knowledge on the antecedents of employee behavior in service recovery by investigating how these antecedents combine to yield different recipes for developing either employee adaptive or proactive behavior in service recovery. Practical implications: The findings provide insights for managers into the different combinations of practices that can be used to develop employee proactive or adaptive behavior in service recovery. Originality/value: To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first study that relies on a configurational approach to understand the combinations of managerial practices that result in employee proactive and adaptive behaviors in service recovery.
AB - Purpose: This study aims to investigate the configurations that drive employee service recovery. Rather than analyzing the net effects of individual antecedents of service recovery, which is the common approach in the literature, this study uses a configurational approach to investigate how five antecedents (customer service orientation, rewards, teamwork, empowerment and customer service training) combine to yield employee adaptive and proactive service recovery behaviors. Design/methodology/approach: The study collects responses from 90 frontline employees through an online survey. Building on configurational theory, the authors developed and empirically validated four research propositions by using a fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis. Findings: Three equifinal configurations of managerial practices result in either employee proactive or adaptive service recovery behaviors. Two of these three configurations result in both adaptive and proactive behaviors. In addition, the findings show that two out of the three configurations that lead to proactive behavior in service recovery also lead to the simultaneous existence of proactive and adaptive behaviors in service recovery. None of the sufficient configurations require the presence of all managerial practices. These results underscore that managers do not have to act on every single managerial intervention area to promote service recovery. Research limitations/implications: The study advances the knowledge on the antecedents of employee behavior in service recovery by investigating how these antecedents combine to yield different recipes for developing either employee adaptive or proactive behavior in service recovery. Practical implications: The findings provide insights for managers into the different combinations of practices that can be used to develop employee proactive or adaptive behavior in service recovery. Originality/value: To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first study that relies on a configurational approach to understand the combinations of managerial practices that result in employee proactive and adaptive behaviors in service recovery.
KW - Employee adaptive service recovery
KW - Employee proactive service recovery
KW - fsQCA
KW - Qualitative comparative analysis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85085679606&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1108/EJM-02-2019-0181
DO - 10.1108/EJM-02-2019-0181
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85085679606
SN - 0309-0566
VL - 54
SP - 1581
EP - 1607
JO - European Journal of Marketing
JF - European Journal of Marketing
IS - 7
ER -