Abstract
Examines the reasoning for the decision to reject the European Commission's proposal that EU Member States should establish a body with responsibility for overseeing and advising upon compliance with the EU public procurement rules in favour of the general monitoring duty provided by Directive 2014/24 art.83(2). Suggests why the proposal is likely to be revived in the future.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 249-255 |
| Number of pages | 7 |
| Journal | Public Procurement Law Review |
| Issue number | 6 |
| Publication status | Published - 3 Nov 2017 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'EU public procurement oversight bodies - the way forward'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver