TY - JOUR
T1 - Evaluating the effectiveness of behavior change techniques in health-related behavior
T2 - a scoping review of methods used
AU - Michie, Susan
AU - West, Robert
AU - Sheals, Kate
AU - Godinho, Cristina A.
N1 - Funding Information:
The links between BCTs and frequently identified mechanisms of action are being investigated in a cross-disciplinary, international project funded by the UK’s Medical Research Council, described in a published protocol paper [62]. We are collaborating in a project, led by Kai Larsen, to develop a taxonomy of behaviors, which takes as a starting point the World Health Organization’s International Classification of Functioning [63].This is a mammoth undertaking, requiring expertise from both behavioral and computer sciences to build such an ontology to make sense of the vast and rapidly accelerating volume of published relevant literature. However, like an encyclopedia, it would have the considerable benefit of becoming useful almost immediately and gradually increasing in value as it grew. By linking with machine learning, it has the potential to efficiently and effectively harness evidence in real time, support the rapid testing and refinement of theories, and make evidence useable and useful to researchers, practitioners, and policymakers. The Human Behavior Change Project will develop shared concepts, terms, and relationships between those concepts to precisely specify not just the content of behavioral interventions (BCTs) but all the mediators and moderators that will allow us to understand their effects on behaviors, specified at different levels of granularity. In this way, it will revolutionize our ability to synthesize evidence about behavior change in real time and to generate new insights about behavior change. It will include a searchable, up-to-date database of evidence that will allow people to design and implement the best possible behavioral intervention for their circumstances.
Funding Information:
Acknowledgements: We would like to thank Dr. Harveen Kaur Ubhi for coding a subset of the review papers in terms of the “PASS” criteria and helping with the revised manuscript preparation. We would also like to thank the Medical Research Council for funding the project, which gave rise to this paper: “Methods for strengthening evaluation and implementation: specifying components of behavior change interventions” (GO901474).
Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2018.
Copyright:
Copyright 2018 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2018/3/1
Y1 - 2018/3/1
N2 - Behavior change interventions typically contain multiple potentially active components: behavior change techniques (BCTs). Identifying which specific BCTs or BCT combinations have the potential to be effective for a given behavior in a given context presents a major challenge. The aim of this study was to review the methods that have been used to identify effective BCTs for given behaviors in given contexts and evaluate their strengths and limitations. A scoping review was conducted of studies that had sought to identify effective BCTs. Articles referring to "behavio(u)r change technique(s)" in the abstract/text were located, and ones that involved identification of effective BCTs were selected. The methods reported were coded. The methods were analyzed in general terms using "PASS" criteria: Practicability (facility to apply the method appropriately), Applicability (facility to generalize from findings to contexts and populations of interest), Sensitivity (facility to identify effective BCTs), and Specificity (facility to rule out ineffective BCTs). A sample of 10% of the studies reviewed was then evaluated using these criteria to assess how far the strengths and limitations identified in principle were borne out in practice. One hundred and thirty-five studies were identified. The methods used in those studies were experimental manipulation of BCTs, observational studies comparing outcomes in the presence or absence of BCTs, meta-analyses of BCT comparisons, meta-regressions evaluating effect sizes with and without specific BCTs, reviews of BCTs found in effective interventions, and meta-classification and regression trees. The limitations of each method meant that only weak conclusions could be drawn regarding the effectiveness of specific BCTs or BCT combinations. Methods for identifying effective BCTs linked to target behavior and context all have important inherent limitations. A strategy needs to be developed that can systematically combine the strengths of the different methods and that can link these constructs in an ontology of behavior change interventions.
AB - Behavior change interventions typically contain multiple potentially active components: behavior change techniques (BCTs). Identifying which specific BCTs or BCT combinations have the potential to be effective for a given behavior in a given context presents a major challenge. The aim of this study was to review the methods that have been used to identify effective BCTs for given behaviors in given contexts and evaluate their strengths and limitations. A scoping review was conducted of studies that had sought to identify effective BCTs. Articles referring to "behavio(u)r change technique(s)" in the abstract/text were located, and ones that involved identification of effective BCTs were selected. The methods reported were coded. The methods were analyzed in general terms using "PASS" criteria: Practicability (facility to apply the method appropriately), Applicability (facility to generalize from findings to contexts and populations of interest), Sensitivity (facility to identify effective BCTs), and Specificity (facility to rule out ineffective BCTs). A sample of 10% of the studies reviewed was then evaluated using these criteria to assess how far the strengths and limitations identified in principle were borne out in practice. One hundred and thirty-five studies were identified. The methods used in those studies were experimental manipulation of BCTs, observational studies comparing outcomes in the presence or absence of BCTs, meta-analyses of BCT comparisons, meta-regressions evaluating effect sizes with and without specific BCTs, reviews of BCTs found in effective interventions, and meta-classification and regression trees. The limitations of each method meant that only weak conclusions could be drawn regarding the effectiveness of specific BCTs or BCT combinations. Methods for identifying effective BCTs linked to target behavior and context all have important inherent limitations. A strategy needs to be developed that can systematically combine the strengths of the different methods and that can link these constructs in an ontology of behavior change interventions.
KW - Behavior
KW - Behavior change techniques
KW - Behavioral interventions
KW - Evidence synthesis
KW - Ontology
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85046090098&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/tbm/ibx019
DO - 10.1093/tbm/ibx019
M3 - Article
C2 - 29381786
AN - SCOPUS:85046090098
SN - 1869-6716
VL - 8
SP - 212
EP - 224
JO - Translational Behavioral Medicine
JF - Translational Behavioral Medicine
IS - 2
ER -