TY - JOUR
T1 - Factorial validity of the Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20) in clinical samples
T2 - a critical examination of the literature and a psychometric study in anorexia nervosa
AU - Torres, Sandra
AU - Guerra, Marina P.
AU - Miller, Kylee
AU - Costa, Patrício
AU - Cruz, Inês
AU - Vieira, Filipa M.
AU - Brandão, Isabel
AU - Roma-Torres, António
AU - Rocha, Magda
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding This work was funded by the Center for Psychology at the University of Porto, Portuguese Science Foundation (FCT UID/ PSI/00050/2013) and EU FEDER through COMPETE 2020 program (POCI-01-0145-FEDER-007294).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
PY - 2019/3/15
Y1 - 2019/3/15
N2 - There is extensive use of the 20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20) in research and clinical practice in anorexia nervosa (AN), though it is not empirically established in this population. This study aims to examine the factorial validity of the TAS-20 in a Portuguese AN sample (N = 125), testing four different models (ranging from 1 to 4 factors) that were identified in critical examination of existing factor analytic studies. Results of confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) suggested that the three-factor solution, measuring difficulty identifying (DIF) and describing feelings (DDF), and externally oriented thinking (EOT), was the best fitting model. The quality of measurement improves if two EOT items (16 and 18) are eliminated. Internal consistency of EOT was low and decreased with age. The results provide support for the factorial validity of the TAS-20 in AN. Nevertheless, the measurement of EOT requires some caution and may be problematic in AN adolescents.
AB - There is extensive use of the 20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20) in research and clinical practice in anorexia nervosa (AN), though it is not empirically established in this population. This study aims to examine the factorial validity of the TAS-20 in a Portuguese AN sample (N = 125), testing four different models (ranging from 1 to 4 factors) that were identified in critical examination of existing factor analytic studies. Results of confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) suggested that the three-factor solution, measuring difficulty identifying (DIF) and describing feelings (DDF), and externally oriented thinking (EOT), was the best fitting model. The quality of measurement improves if two EOT items (16 and 18) are eliminated. Internal consistency of EOT was low and decreased with age. The results provide support for the factorial validity of the TAS-20 in AN. Nevertheless, the measurement of EOT requires some caution and may be problematic in AN adolescents.
KW - Alexithymia
KW - Anorexia nervosa
KW - Clinical samples
KW - Confirmatory factor analysis
KW - Factor structure
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85044600850
U2 - 10.1007/s10880-018-9562-y
DO - 10.1007/s10880-018-9562-y
M3 - Article
C2 - 29603033
AN - SCOPUS:85044600850
SN - 1068-9583
VL - 26
SP - 33
EP - 46
JO - Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings
JF - Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings
IS - 1
ER -