Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Histological and morphometrical evaluation of non-critical bone defects after treatment with biomaterial and bisphosphonates

  • Gustavo Vicentis Oliveira Fernandes*
  • , Bruno Gomes Dos Santos Martins
  • , Artak Heboyan
  • , Rogerio Moraes Castilho
  • , Juliana Campos Hasse Fernandes
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)
11 Downloads

Abstract

Background: The primary goal of this in vivo study was to ascertain if systemic bisphosphonates (BPs) positively affect bone repair in non-critical defects when assisted with a carbonated hydroxyapatite graft biomaterial (Biomat). Material and Methods: Thirty-six female rats were allocated into two control groups (blood clot [BC] and alloplastic biomaterial); two groups with zoledronate (third-generation BPs): Zol.BP and Zol.BP+Biomat; and two groups with clodronate (first-generation BPs): Clod.BP and the Clod.BP+Biomat. The experimental groups started the application of BP 60 days before surgery. Then, a 2 mm non-critical defect was performed in the rats’ femur and filled according to the group. All animals were euthanized 30 days after surgery, and the samples were collected for histological and histomorphometry analysis, respectively, for descriptive and quantitative analyses. Results: Zol.BP+Biomat had greater new bone formation, whereas clodronate presented high osteogenic potential, significantly increasing the observed levels of newly formed bone even in the absence of the biomaterial. Histomorphometrically, BC had 2% bone formation compared to the biomaterial group (5%). Zol.BP and Col.BP achieved bone formation of 6-fold (12%, p>0.05) and 9.5-fold (19%, p<0.05), respectively, when compared with BC. Zol.BP+Biomat group presented the highest value found for newly formed bone (24%), 12-fold more than BC (p<0.001) and 4.8-fold more than the biomaterial group (p<0.01). Conclusions: It is possible to conclude that the systemic use of BP positively affected non-critical bone defects when associated with biomaterials, mainly when the third generation of BPs was used in this association.
Original languageEnglish
Article number27033
Pages (from-to)e491-e498
Number of pages8
JournalMedicina Oral Patologia Oral y Cirugia Bucal
Volume30
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2025

Keywords

  • Alloplastic biomaterial
  • Bisphosphonates
  • Bone defect
  • Bone healing
  • In vitro

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Histological and morphometrical evaluation of non-critical bone defects after treatment with biomaterial and bisphosphonates'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this