TY - JOUR
T1 - I need a doctor, call me a doctor
T2 - attachment and the evaluation of general practitioners before and during the covid‐19 pandemic
AU - Gruda, Dritjon
AU - Kafetsios, Konstantinos
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was funded by seed funding provided by the School of Business, National University of Ireland Maynooth. The APC was funded by the corresponding author.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
PY - 2021/7/26
Y1 - 2021/7/26
N2 - Attachment is a system of threat regulation, and insecure (anxious and avoidant) attachment orientations are important individual difference antecedents to the cognitive and affective at-tributions of trait inferences. However, little is known about how threat‐related contexts, such as the current COVID‐19 pandemic, influence attachment‐related socio‐cognitive schemas. Using an experimental research design across two independent samples of 330 (pre‐onset of COVID‐19) and 233 (post‐onset of COVID‐19) participants, we tested whether attachment orientations influenced general practitioner (GP) ratings and selection differently pre‐ and post‐onset of the COVID‐19 pan-demic. We found that during the COVID‐19 pandemic, when presented with only negative information signals, avoidant individuals attributed positive ratings to GPs, with differing ratings as the number of positive signals increased. Differences between pre‐ and post‐onset of the COVID‐19 pandemic were less pronounced with regards to positive signals. We discuss these results in line with signal detection theory (SDT) and provide practical implications in response to our findings.
AB - Attachment is a system of threat regulation, and insecure (anxious and avoidant) attachment orientations are important individual difference antecedents to the cognitive and affective at-tributions of trait inferences. However, little is known about how threat‐related contexts, such as the current COVID‐19 pandemic, influence attachment‐related socio‐cognitive schemas. Using an experimental research design across two independent samples of 330 (pre‐onset of COVID‐19) and 233 (post‐onset of COVID‐19) participants, we tested whether attachment orientations influenced general practitioner (GP) ratings and selection differently pre‐ and post‐onset of the COVID‐19 pan-demic. We found that during the COVID‐19 pandemic, when presented with only negative information signals, avoidant individuals attributed positive ratings to GPs, with differing ratings as the number of positive signals increased. Differences between pre‐ and post‐onset of the COVID‐19 pandemic were less pronounced with regards to positive signals. We discuss these results in line with signal detection theory (SDT) and provide practical implications in response to our findings.
KW - Adult attachment
KW - COVID‐19
KW - Experiment
KW - Medical professionals
KW - Social perception
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85111095748&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/ijerph18157914
DO - 10.3390/ijerph18157914
M3 - Article
C2 - 34360207
AN - SCOPUS:85111095748
SN - 1661-7827
VL - 18
JO - International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
JF - International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
IS - 15
M1 - 7914
ER -