TY - JOUR
T1 - In situ pulse respirometric methods for the estimation of kinetic and stoichiometric parameters in aerobic microbial communities
AU - Oliveira, Catarina S.
AU - Ordaz, Alberto
AU - Ferreira, Eugénio C.
AU - Alves, Madalena
AU - Thalasso, Frédéric
N1 - Funding Information:
This project was financed by the European Union in the Framework of the Marie Curie Actions (IRG4 6647). C.S. Oliveira and F. Thalasso received a grant from Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (SFRH/BD/32289/2006 and SFRH/BI/15847, respectively). A. Ordaz received a grant from Conacyt (#208321).
Copyright:
Copyright 2011 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2011/12/15
Y1 - 2011/12/15
N2 - In situ pulse respirometry was applied in an activated sludge bubble column treating synthetic wastewater for the estimation of the (i) maximum specific oxygen consumption rate, (ii) substrate affinity constant, (iii) biomass growth yield, (iv) maintenance coefficient, and (v) specific endogenous respiration rate. Parameters obtained from respirometry were compared to those obtained by the chemostat method, based on substrate and biomass measurements, under several dilution rates. The low sensitivity of substrate measurement methods and the difficulties of sampling heterogeneous biomass suspension are critical issues limiting the applicability of the chemostat method. Additionally, the extensive time consuming nature of this method allows concluding that chemostat method presents several disadvantages in comparison with in situ pulse respirometric techniques. Parameters were obtained from respirograms by fitting ASM1 and ASM3 models, and from experiments performed by injecting pulses of increasing substrate concentration. The injection of pulses of increasing concentration was the most adequate method, with several advantages such as a simpler experimental data interpretation, and results with better confidence. Considering the assessment and comparison of the experimental and calculation methods presented, it is recommended that the estimation of kinetic and stoichiometric parameters in mixed aerobic cultures should preferentially be performed by using in situ respirometric techniques.
AB - In situ pulse respirometry was applied in an activated sludge bubble column treating synthetic wastewater for the estimation of the (i) maximum specific oxygen consumption rate, (ii) substrate affinity constant, (iii) biomass growth yield, (iv) maintenance coefficient, and (v) specific endogenous respiration rate. Parameters obtained from respirometry were compared to those obtained by the chemostat method, based on substrate and biomass measurements, under several dilution rates. The low sensitivity of substrate measurement methods and the difficulties of sampling heterogeneous biomass suspension are critical issues limiting the applicability of the chemostat method. Additionally, the extensive time consuming nature of this method allows concluding that chemostat method presents several disadvantages in comparison with in situ pulse respirometric techniques. Parameters were obtained from respirograms by fitting ASM1 and ASM3 models, and from experiments performed by injecting pulses of increasing substrate concentration. The injection of pulses of increasing concentration was the most adequate method, with several advantages such as a simpler experimental data interpretation, and results with better confidence. Considering the assessment and comparison of the experimental and calculation methods presented, it is recommended that the estimation of kinetic and stoichiometric parameters in mixed aerobic cultures should preferentially be performed by using in situ respirometric techniques.
KW - Aerobic processes
KW - ASM
KW - Chemostat
KW - Heterotrophes
KW - In situ respirometry
KW - Kinetic parameters
KW - Pirt
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80054840376&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.bej.2011.08.001
DO - 10.1016/j.bej.2011.08.001
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:80054840376
SN - 1369-703X
VL - 58-59
SP - 12
EP - 19
JO - Biochemical Engineering Journal
JF - Biochemical Engineering Journal
IS - 1
ER -