TY - JOUR
T1 - Information interventions and social media
AU - Gregorio, Giovanni De
AU - Stremlau, Nicole
N1 - Funding Information:
Published: 30 June 2021 Received: 11 November 2020 Accepted: 23 April 2021 Funding: This research is part of the ConflictNet project (The Politics and Practice of Social Media in Conflict). It has been funded by the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (Grant Agreement No. 716686, ConflictNET). Competing Interests: The author has declared that no competing interests exist that have influenced the text. Licence: This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License (Germany) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/de/deed.en Copyright remains with the author(s).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society. All rights reserved.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Recent conflicts, particularly in Asia and Africa, have highlighted the potential for social media to provoke or exacerbate violent conflict and mass atrocities. The role of media and propaganda in disseminating hate and violence has been a longstanding aspect of war. In some cases of violent conflict, international actors—including the United Nations (UN)—have undertaken ‘information interventions’, a term that came into its own in the mid-1990s in response to the ongoing conflict in the Balkans, and the use of radio in the Rwandan genocide in 1992. While information intervention has historically been applied to mass media, this article explores the relevance and applicability of this approach to online communications, and social media in particular. We unpack whether and how information intervention might apply when social media has a role in inflaming extreme violence, or genocide, by disseminating disinformation and hate speech and international actors have a responsibility to protect and halt mass atrocities.
AB - Recent conflicts, particularly in Asia and Africa, have highlighted the potential for social media to provoke or exacerbate violent conflict and mass atrocities. The role of media and propaganda in disseminating hate and violence has been a longstanding aspect of war. In some cases of violent conflict, international actors—including the United Nations (UN)—have undertaken ‘information interventions’, a term that came into its own in the mid-1990s in response to the ongoing conflict in the Balkans, and the use of radio in the Rwandan genocide in 1992. While information intervention has historically been applied to mass media, this article explores the relevance and applicability of this approach to online communications, and social media in particular. We unpack whether and how information intervention might apply when social media has a role in inflaming extreme violence, or genocide, by disseminating disinformation and hate speech and international actors have a responsibility to protect and halt mass atrocities.
KW - Conflicts
KW - Content moderation
KW - Hate speech
KW - Responsibility to protect
KW - Social media
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85110516244&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.14763/2021.2.1567
DO - 10.14763/2021.2.1567
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85110516244
SN - 2197-6775
VL - 10
SP - 1
EP - 25
JO - Internet Policy Review
JF - Internet Policy Review
IS - 2
ER -