Internet shutdowns and the limits of law

Giovanni de Gregorio*, Nicole Stremlau

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Internet shutdowns are on the rise. In the past few years, an escalation of this blunt censoring practice has affected different regions of the world, particularly Africa and Asia. Scholars and advocates have proposed no substantive solutions to effectively address Internet shutdowns, and analysis has largely been limited to examining the negative effects through data about their frequency, duration, and economic costs. This article attempts to move beyond the polarized debate between “keep it on” and “shut it off” to explore how there can be more transparency around decision-making processes behind Internet shutdowns. We also discuss the limits of law when it comes to the imposition and implementation of shutdowns. Shutdowns tend to be imposed somewhat arbitrarily with little process. Bringing back legal arguments into the exploration of the justifications around shutdowns may make the use of shutdowns less frequent and more limited, when they do occur.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)4224-4243
Number of pages20
JournalInternational Journal of Communication
Volume14
Publication statusPublished - 2020
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Freedom of expression
  • Human rights
  • Information intervention
  • Internet access
  • Internet shutdowns
  • Social media

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Internet shutdowns and the limits of law'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this