Judicialization of economic and monetary union: between a rock and a soft place?

Nuno Albuquerque Matos*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

11 Downloads

Abstract

The European Central Bank has been active since the sovereign debt crisis that struck European Union Member States by putting in place several asset-purchasing programmes such as Outright Monetary Transactions and Public Sector Purchase Programme. As much as these decisions have proven the pivotal importance of this institution within the monetary union, they have also spurred controversy on potentially having exceeded the competences attributed to the Union. The german federal constitutional court heard challenges to both and requested the Court of Justice to decide on their validity within the framework of a preliminary ruling. The decision of the former court to declare the Public Sector Purchase Programme ultra vires -in this way countering the preliminary ruling decision- as well as its argumentation could produce many institutional consequences to both the European Central Bank and Court of Justice of the European Union. Finally, it has shown the limits of European Union integration and will inevitably propel discussions on which way to go in the future: It is time for this discussion to come out from courtrooms into the public sphere.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)73-106
Number of pages34
JournalCuadernos Europeos de Deusto
Issue number65
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 23 Sept 2021

Keywords

  • Economic and monetary Union
  • Gauweiller
  • Monetary policy
  • Ultra vires
  • Weiss

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Judicialization of economic and monetary union: between a rock and a soft place?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this