Making word-of-mouth impactful: why consumers react more to WOM about experiential than material purchases

Wilson Bastos*, Sarah G. Moore*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

37 Citations (Scopus)
82 Downloads

Abstract

This paper documents evidence from five studies showing that WOM about experiential versus material purchases is superior in evoking reactions from WOM receivers that are valuable for firms (e.g., purchase intention). We find that this difference emerges from receivers’ perception that WOM about an experience (vs. material object) is more substantive (i.e., involving, meaningful). Further, we test two potential antecedents of substantive WOM: receivers’ and senders’ identification with the purchase. Mediation- and moderation-based evidence indicates that receiver-, but not sender-, identification drives substantiveness. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)110-123
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Business Research
Volume130
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2021

Keywords

  • Consumer reaction
  • Experiential purchase
  • Material purchase
  • Substantiveness
  • Word-of-mouth

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Making word-of-mouth impactful: why consumers react more to WOM about experiential than material purchases'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this