Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

“Most voted women” – representations of gender in the Portuguese media coverage of the 2021 presidential elections

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter › peer-review

7 Downloads

Abstract

This study examines how media discourse represented the two women candi‑ dates in the coverage of the 2021 Presidential elections in Portugal. Resorting to Van Leeuwen’s Social Actor Network model (Van Leeuwen, 2008, 1996), the methodology is of a qualitative nature, incorporating elements of corpus linguistics. The main findings are that gender was not the main motivation for the representation of the different candidates but it was a central facet in the media coverage of the elections. The fact that women tended to be more func‑ tionalised than men and that the male far-right candidate was more appraised than others point to a need to further explore how gender intersects with other factors (ideology, class) in the discourse of public affairs.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationLanguage and gender
EditorsAna Margarida Abrantes, Benjamin Fagard
Place of PublicationLisbon
PublisherUniversidade Católica Editora
Chapter1
Pages43-65
Number of pages22
Edition1
ISBN (Electronic)9789725410820
ISBN (Print)9789725410813
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2025

Publication series

NameEstudos de Comunicação e Cultura

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 5 - Gender Equality
    SDG 5 Gender Equality

Keywords

  • Gender
  • Media discourse
  • Social actors
  • Representation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '“Most voted women” – representations of gender in the Portuguese media coverage of the 2021 presidential elections'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
  • Language and gender

    Fagard, B. (Editor) & Abrantes, A. M. (Editor), May 2025, Lisboa: UCP Editora. 313 p. (Estudos de Comunicação e Cultura)

    Research output: Book/Report › Edited book › peer-review

    Open Access
    File
    48 Downloads

Cite this