TY - JOUR
T1 - Mothers’ and fathers’ attachment and caregiving representations during transition to parenthood
T2 - an actor–partner approach
AU - Fonseca, Ana
AU - Nazaré, Bárbara
AU - Canavarro, Maria Cristina
N1 - Funding Information:
This study is part of the Relationships, Development & Health Research Group of the R&D Unit Cognitive-Behavioural Centre for Research and Intervention (CINEICC) of the Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Coimbra (PEst-OE/PSI/UI0730/2014). Ana Fonseca and Bárbara Nazaré were supported by PhD Scholarships from the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (SFRH/BD/47053/2008, SFRH/BD/43204/2008, respectively).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018, © 2018 Society for Reproductive and Infant Psychology.
Copyright:
Copyright 2018 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2018/5/27
Y1 - 2018/5/27
N2 - Objective: This study aimed to investigate the effect of one’s attachment representations on one’s and the partner’s caregiving representations. Background: According to attachment theory, individual differences in parenting and caregiving behaviours may be a function of parents’ caregiving representations of the self as caregiver, and of others as worthy of care, which are rooted on parents’ attachment representations. Furthermore, the care-seeking and caregiving interactions that occur within the couple relationship may also shape individuals’ caregiving representations. Methods: The sample comprised 286 cohabiting couples who were assessed during pregnancy (attachment representations) and one month post-birth (caregiving representations). Path analyses were used to examine effects among variables. Results: Results showed that for mothers and fathers, their own more insecure attachment representations predicted their less positive caregiving representations of the self as caregiver and of others as worthy of help and more self-focused motivations for caregiving. Moreover, fathers’ attachment representations were found to predict mothers’ caregiving representations of themselves as caregivers. Conclusions: Secure attachment representations of both members of the couple seem to be an inner resource promoting parents’ positive representations of caregiving, and should be assessed and fostered during the transition to parenthood in both members of the couple.
AB - Objective: This study aimed to investigate the effect of one’s attachment representations on one’s and the partner’s caregiving representations. Background: According to attachment theory, individual differences in parenting and caregiving behaviours may be a function of parents’ caregiving representations of the self as caregiver, and of others as worthy of care, which are rooted on parents’ attachment representations. Furthermore, the care-seeking and caregiving interactions that occur within the couple relationship may also shape individuals’ caregiving representations. Methods: The sample comprised 286 cohabiting couples who were assessed during pregnancy (attachment representations) and one month post-birth (caregiving representations). Path analyses were used to examine effects among variables. Results: Results showed that for mothers and fathers, their own more insecure attachment representations predicted their less positive caregiving representations of the self as caregiver and of others as worthy of help and more self-focused motivations for caregiving. Moreover, fathers’ attachment representations were found to predict mothers’ caregiving representations of themselves as caregivers. Conclusions: Secure attachment representations of both members of the couple seem to be an inner resource promoting parents’ positive representations of caregiving, and should be assessed and fostered during the transition to parenthood in both members of the couple.
KW - Attachment representations
KW - Caregiving representations
KW - Couple dynamics
KW - Gender
KW - Transition to parenthood
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85044230232&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/02646838.2018.1449194
DO - 10.1080/02646838.2018.1449194
M3 - Article
C2 - 29553291
AN - SCOPUS:85044230232
SN - 0264-6838
VL - 36
SP - 246
EP - 260
JO - Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology
JF - Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology
IS - 3
ER -