Novelty is not enough: Spanish Supreme Court rejects unity of the art in an enigmatic decision

Original language	English
Journal	Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpt179
Publication status	Published - 10 Oct 2013

Access to Document

• 10.1093/jiplp/jpt179

Cite this

• APA
• Author
• BIBTEX
• Harvard
• Standard
• RIS
• Vancouver

Silva, N. S. E. (2013). Novelty is not enough: Spanish Supreme Court rejects unity of the art in an enigmatic decision. Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpt179

Silva, Nuno Sousa e. / Novelty is not enough : Spanish Supreme Court rejects unity of the art in an enigmatic decision. In: Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice. 2013.

@article{53083488bece40b0a45ebb35829d6762,

title = "Novelty is not enough: Spanish Supreme Court rejects unity of the art in an enigmatic decision",

author = "Silva, {Nuno Sousa e}",

year = "2013",

month = oct,

day = "10",

doi = "10.1093/jiplp/jpt179",

language = "English",

journal = "Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice",

issn = "1747-1540",

publisher = "Oxford University Press",

}

Silva, NSE 2013, 'Novelty is not enough: Spanish Supreme Court rejects unity of the art in an enigmatic decision', Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpt179

Novelty is not enough: Spanish Supreme Court rejects unity of the art in an enigmatic decision. / Silva, Nuno Sousa e.
In: Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 10.10.2013.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Novelty is not enough

T2 - Spanish Supreme Court rejects unity of the art in an enigmatic decision

AU - Silva, Nuno Sousa e

PY - 2013/10/10

Y1 - 2013/10/10

U2 - 10.1093/jiplp/jpt179

DO - 10.1093/jiplp/jpt179

M3 - Article

SN - 1747-1540

JO - Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice

JF - Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice

ER -

Silva NSE. Novelty is not enough: Spanish Supreme Court rejects unity of the art in an enigmatic decision. Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice. 2013 Oct 10. doi: 10.1093/jiplp/jpt179