Abstract
Considerable research in strategy and innovation has been devoted to examining when and how firms accumulate resources. Yet, little empirical work has focused on when firms disband resources and how this decision to disband resources is affected by firm strategy. This oversight is surprising since theoretical work has highlighted the importance of knowing which assets to grow and which assets to trim. This paper shows that firms' decisions to disband assets are significantly influenced by earlier strategic choices, and the effects are distributed non-uniformly across firms in the industry. We study these issues by examining how the R&D strategy that a pharmaceutical firm chooses - exploratory versus exploitative - influences the likelihood that firms disband their patents: specifically, decide not to renew the patent and allow the intellectual property right to expire before the end of the patent term.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 83-98 |
| Number of pages | 16 |
| Journal | European Management Review |
| Volume | 12 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Jun 2015 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 9 Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
Keywords
- Asset disbandment
- Exploration and exploitation
- Patent renewal
- Pharmaceuticals
- R&D strategy
- Resource based view
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Patently wrong? Firm strategy and the decision to disband technological assets'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver