Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Performance of raw bovine meat preservation by hyperbaric storage (quasi energetically costless) compared to refrigeration

  • Paulo Freitas
  • , Sofia A. Pereira
  • , Mauro D. Santos
  • , Susana P. Alves
  • , Rui J.B. Bessa
  • , Ivonne Delgadillo
  • , Jorge A. Saraiva*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Hyperbaric storage at room temperature (without temperature control) of raw bovine meat was studied and compared to refrigeration. Samples were first stored for 12 h at 50, 100 and 150 MPa, and in a second set of experiments, for a longer period of 10 days at 50 MPa. For the 12 h storage, refrigeration and 50 MPa had a similar microbial growth inhibition effect and, at 100 and 150 MPa an additional microbial inactivation effect was found. For the longer experiment (10 days at 50 MPa) results pointed for a shelf-life increase of raw beef compared to samples stored under refrigeration. For both tests (12 h and 10 days) samples preserved under pressure showed no detrimental effect on physicochemical parameters comparatively to the initial and refrigerated samples.These results indicate that hyperbaric storage at room temperature not only allows high energy savings, but additionally has potential to extend the shelf-life of a perishable food product compared to refrigeration.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)64-72
Number of pages9
JournalMeat Science
Volume121
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2016
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 12 - Responsible Consumption and Production
    SDG 12 Responsible Consumption and Production

Keywords

  • Beef
  • Food preservation
  • Hyperbaric storage
  • Raw meat
  • Refrigeration
  • Shelf-life

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Performance of raw bovine meat preservation by hyperbaric storage (quasi energetically costless) compared to refrigeration'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this