Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Physical intimate partner violence in Europe: results from a population-based multi-center study in six countries

  • D. Costa*
  • , E. Hatzidimitriadou
  • , E. Ioannidi-Kapolou
  • , J. Lindert
  • , J. Soares
  • , O. Sundin
  • , O. Toth
  • , H. Barros
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalMeeting Abstractpeer-review

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The prevalence, determinants and health consequences of physical intimate partner violence (IPV) in Western Europe has never been considered in a cross-cultural perspective, taking men and women involvement in the three patterns of violence: victims, perpetrators or both. METHODS: We assessed a representative sample of adults (18–64 years; n = 3496) living in Athens-Greece, Porto-Portugal, Budapest-Hungary, London-United Kingdom, Östersund-Sweden and Stuttgart-Germany. Past-year physical IPV was assessed using the Revised-Conflict-Tactics-Scales. The association between IPV and child abuse, socioeconomics (education, occupation, unemployment duration), behavioral (alcohol) and health factors (chronic diseases, anxiety and depressive symptoms), by sex and IPV pattern, was estimated using age- and city-adjusted logistic regression odds ratios (AOR, 95% confidence intervals). RESULTS: Physical IPV was reported by 17.7% (16.0–19.4%) of women (3.5% victims-only, 4.2% perpetrators-only and 10.0% both victims and perpetrators) and by 19.8% (17.8–22.0%) of men (4.1%, 3.8% and 11.9%, respectively). In general, Greek presented the highest and Portuguese the lowest estimates. History of child abuse increased the risk of all IPV patterns. In women, unemployment duration and blue collar occupation were associated with increased likelihood of all IPV patterns. In men, only unemployment duration was associated with increased perpetration and lower occupation with victimization. Heavy alcohol use, chronic diseases and self-assessment of health as poor or fair were significantly associated with female involvement in IPV, both as victim and perpetrator. Anxiety and depressive symptoms severity was higher in male and female declaring both victimization and perpetration. CONCLUSIONS: In these European men and women IPV was frequently experienced and child abuse a common determinant of victimization, perpetration or bi-directional violence. Irrespective of IPV pattern, socioeconomic inequalities were evident in females but less consistent in males. These findings confirm IPV as a major public health concern, and for those involved it significantly increases the burden of disease.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)i264-i264
Number of pages1
JournalInternational Journal of Epidemiology
Volume44
Issue numbersuppl. 1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 17 Aug 2014
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 5 - Gender Equality
    SDG 5 Gender Equality
  2. SDG 10 - Reduced Inequalities
    SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
  3. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Physical intimate partner violence in Europe: results from a population-based multi-center study in six countries'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this