Polarization of perceived procedural justice

Douglas H. Flint*, Pablo Hernandez-Marrero, Martin Wielemaker

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study examined polarization of perceptions of Procedural Justice. Two polarization mechanisms are examined, Persuasive Arguments and Social Comparisons. Participants were students enrolled in a first-year introductory business class. There were 216 participants in the Persuasive Arguments study, 429 in the Social Comparisons study. The average age of all participants was 22.3 yr. (SD = 2.1); 56% were women. Fields of study represented were business, engineering, information technology, and sports. Analysis showed under conditions of low Procedural Justice, polarization effects were only found with the Persuasive Arguments mechanism. Under conditions of high Procedural Justice, polarization effects were only found with Social Comparisons. Implications for group polarization and Procedural Justice theories are considered.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)35-50
Number of pages16
JournalPerceptual and Motor Skills
Volume102
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2006
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Procedural justice
  • Distributive justice
  • Group Polarization
  • Organisational justice; systemic justice
  • Experimental Research

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Polarization of perceived procedural justice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this