Politics at the mall: the moral foundations of boycotts

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

33 Citations (Scopus)
24 Downloads

Abstract

This article examines the motivations of liberals and conservatives to boycott and buycott. Nine studies demonstrate that although both liberals and conservatives engage in consumer political actions, they do so for different reasons influenced by their unique moral concerns: Liberals engage in boycotts and buycotts that are associated with the protection of harm and fairness moral values (individualizing moral values), whereas conservatives engage in boycotts and buycotts that are associated with the protection of authority, loyalty, and purity moral values (binding moral values). In addition, the individualizing moral values lead to a generally more positive attitude toward boycotts, which explains why liberals are more likely to boycott and buycott. Liberals' greater concern for the suffering of others and unfair treatment makes them more likely to engage in consumer political actions. Conservatives, in turn, engage in consumer political actions in relatively rarer cases in which their binding moral values are affected by corporate activity.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)494-513
Number of pages20
JournalJournal of Public Policy and Marketing
Volume39
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2020

Keywords

  • Boycotting
  • Buycotting
  • Moral foundations
  • Political ideology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Politics at the mall: the moral foundations of boycotts'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this