TY - JOUR
T1 - Precision measurement of cardiac structure and function in cardiovascular magnetic resonance using machine learning
AU - Davies, Rhodri H.
AU - Augusto, João B.
AU - Bhuva, Anish
AU - Xue, Hui
AU - Treibel, Thomas A.
AU - Ye, Yang
AU - Hughes, Rebecca K.
AU - Bai, Wenjia
AU - Lau, Clement
AU - Shiwani, Hunain
AU - Fontana, Marianna
AU - Kozor, Rebecca
AU - Herrey, Anna
AU - Lopes, Luis R.
AU - Maestrini, Viviana
AU - Rosmini, Stefania
AU - Petersen, Steffen E.
AU - Kellman, Peter
AU - Rueckert, Daniel
AU - Greenwood, John P.
AU - Captur, Gabriella
AU - Manisty, Charlotte
AU - Schelbert, Erik
AU - Moon, James C.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, The Author(s).
PY - 2022/12
Y1 - 2022/12
N2 - Background: Measurement of cardiac structure and function from images (e.g. volumes, mass and derived parameters such as left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction [LVEF]) guides care for millions. This is best assessed using cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR), but image analysis is currently performed by individual clinicians, which introduces error. We sought to develop a machine learning algorithm for volumetric analysis of CMR images with demonstrably better precision than human analysis. Methods: A fully automated machine learning algorithm was trained on 1923 scans (10 scanner models, 13 institutions, 9 clinical conditions, 60,000 contours) and used to segment the LV blood volume and myocardium. Performance was quantified by measuring precision on an independent multi-site validation dataset with multiple pathologies with n = 109 patients, scanned twice. This dataset was augmented with a further 1277 patients scanned as part of routine clinical care to allow qualitative assessment of generalization ability by identifying mis-segmentations. Machine learning algorithm (‘machine’) performance was compared to three clinicians (‘human’) and a commercial tool (cvi42, Circle Cardiovascular Imaging). Findings: Machine analysis was quicker (20 s per patient) than human (13 min). Overall machine mis-segmentation rate was 1 in 479 images for the combined dataset, occurring mostly in rare pathologies not encountered in training. Without correcting these mis-segmentations, machine analysis had superior precision to three clinicians (e.g. scan-rescan coefficients of variation of human vs machine: LVEF 6.0% vs 4.2%, LV mass 4.8% vs. 3.6%; both P < 0.05), translating to a 46% reduction in required trial sample size using an LVEF endpoint. Conclusion: We present a fully automated algorithm for measuring LV structure and global systolic function that betters human performance for speed and precision.
AB - Background: Measurement of cardiac structure and function from images (e.g. volumes, mass and derived parameters such as left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction [LVEF]) guides care for millions. This is best assessed using cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR), but image analysis is currently performed by individual clinicians, which introduces error. We sought to develop a machine learning algorithm for volumetric analysis of CMR images with demonstrably better precision than human analysis. Methods: A fully automated machine learning algorithm was trained on 1923 scans (10 scanner models, 13 institutions, 9 clinical conditions, 60,000 contours) and used to segment the LV blood volume and myocardium. Performance was quantified by measuring precision on an independent multi-site validation dataset with multiple pathologies with n = 109 patients, scanned twice. This dataset was augmented with a further 1277 patients scanned as part of routine clinical care to allow qualitative assessment of generalization ability by identifying mis-segmentations. Machine learning algorithm (‘machine’) performance was compared to three clinicians (‘human’) and a commercial tool (cvi42, Circle Cardiovascular Imaging). Findings: Machine analysis was quicker (20 s per patient) than human (13 min). Overall machine mis-segmentation rate was 1 in 479 images for the combined dataset, occurring mostly in rare pathologies not encountered in training. Without correcting these mis-segmentations, machine analysis had superior precision to three clinicians (e.g. scan-rescan coefficients of variation of human vs machine: LVEF 6.0% vs 4.2%, LV mass 4.8% vs. 3.6%; both P < 0.05), translating to a 46% reduction in required trial sample size using an LVEF endpoint. Conclusion: We present a fully automated algorithm for measuring LV structure and global systolic function that betters human performance for speed and precision.
KW - Cardiac magnetic resonance
KW - Cardiovascular imaging
KW - Image processing
KW - Machine learning
KW - Ventricular function
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85126220336&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/s12968-022-00846-4
DO - 10.1186/s12968-022-00846-4
M3 - Article
C2 - 35272664
AN - SCOPUS:85126220336
SN - 1097-6647
VL - 24
JO - Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
JF - Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
IS - 1
M1 - 16
ER -