Prevalence of hepatitis E virus antibodies in workers occupationally exposed to swine in Portugal

J. Teixeira, J. R. Mesquita*, S. S. Pereira, R. M. S. Oliveira, J. Abreu-Silva, A. Rodrigues, M. Myrmel, K. Stene-Johansen, J. Øverbø, G. Gonçalves, M. S. J. Nascimento

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

40 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The concept of zoonotic hepatitis E in industrialized countries has emerged with the discovery of swine strains of hepatitis E virus (HEV) genotype 3, closely related to human HEV. Different routes of zoonotic HEV transmission have been recognized, including contact with infected pigs. Workers occupationally exposed to swine (WOES) have been considered a risk group for HEV infection, but contradictory results have been reported. In the present study, we searched for anti-HEV IgG in WOES (butchers, slaughterhouse workers, veterinarians and pig farmers; n = 114) and in the general population (n = 804) in order to investigate the potential occupational risk of zoonotic HEV infection in this work group. A significantly higher (p = 0.008) anti-HEV IgG seroprevalence was found in WOES (30.7 %) when compared with the general population (19.9 %). Multivariate analysis showed that having professions with exposure to pigs for more than 16.5 years was a risk factor for being positive for anti-HEV IgG (aOR of 5.4, 95 % CI 1.9–15.6, p = 0.002). To our knowledge, this is the first study on the prevalence of anti-HEV IgG in WOES in Portugal, also showing increased probability for infection in this group.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)77-81
Number of pages5
JournalMedical Microbiology and Immunology
Volume206
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2017
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Genotype 3
  • HEV
  • Occupational exposure
  • Portugal
  • Swine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Prevalence of hepatitis E virus antibodies in workers occupationally exposed to swine in Portugal'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this