Prisma guidelines for systematic and scoping reviews: cultural mapping of creative industries

Luana Santos; Ana Luísa Sousa; Luís Teixeira

doi:10.34190/ecrm.21.1.272

Prisma guidelines for systematic and scoping reviews: cultural mapping of creative industries

Luana Santos, Ana Luísa Sousa, Luís Teixeira

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution › peer-review

39 Downloads

Abstract

While policymakers have had a great interest in debating Cultural and Creative Industries (CCIs), there is a lack of literature presenting a systematic overview of existing relevant research regarding CCIs mapping. This paper discusses and compares PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines for Systematic Review (SR) and PRISMA for Scoping Review (ScR) for synthesizing research on CCIs mapping. ‘A systematic review attempts to collate all empirical evidence that fits pre-specified eligibility criteria to answer a specific research question. It uses explicit, systematic methods that are selected to minimize bias, thus providing reliable findings from which conclusions can be drawn and decisions made’ (Liberati et al. 2009: 65). ScR ‘(…) follow a systematic approach to map evidence on a topic and identify main concepts, theories, sources, and knowledge gaps’ (Tricco et al. 2018: 467). After analyzing and applying the guidelines and further documentation on both protocols, the ScR revealed to be more suitable in a complex field with distinct terminologies, production contexts, methodologies and objectives. Since certain topics in SR become optional, ScR is easier to apply in fields in which methods are difficult to compare and quantify, such as the Arts and Humanities.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	Proceedings of the 21st European Conference on Research Methodology for Business and Management Studies, ECRM 2022
Editors	Manuel Au-Yong-Oliveira, Carlos Costa
Place of Publication	Reading
Publisher	Academic Conferences and Publishing International Limited
Pages	216-219
Number of pages	4
ISBN (Electronic)	9781914587375
ISBN (Print)	9781914587368
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.34190/ecrm.21.1.272
Publication status	Published - 23 May 2022
Event	21st European Conference on Research Methodology for Business Management - University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal Duration: 2 Jun 2022 → 3 Jun 2022 https://www.academic-conferences.org/conferences/ecrm/ecrm-programme/

Publication series

Name	Proceedings of the European Conference on Research Methods in Business and Management Studies
Volume	2022-June
ISSN (Print)	2049-0968
ISSN (Electronic)	2049-0976

Conference

Conference	21st European Conference on Research Methodology for Business Management
Abbreviated title	ECRM 2022
Country/Territory	Portugal
City	Aveiro
Period	2/06/22 → 3/06/22
Internet address	https://www.academic-conferences.org/conferences/ecrm/ecrm-programme/

Keywords

PRISMA
Scoping review
Systematic review
Cultural mapping
Cultural and Creative Industries (CCIs)

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.34190/ecrm.21.1.272Licence: CC BY-NC-ND

44798129Final published version, 824 KBLicence: CC BY-NC-ND

http://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/39656Licence: CC BY-NC-ND

Cite this

Santos, L., Sousa, A. L., & Teixeira, L. (2022). Prisma guidelines for systematic and scoping reviews: cultural mapping of creative industries. In M. Au-Yong-Oliveira, & C. Costa (Eds.), Proceedings of the 21st European Conference on Research Methodology for Business and Management Studies, ECRM 2022 (pp. 216-219). (Proceedings of the European Conference on Research Methods in Business and Management Studies; Vol. 2022-June). Academic Conferences and Publishing International Limited. https://doi.org/10.34190/ecrm.21.1.272

Santos, Luana ; Sousa, Ana Luísa ; Teixeira, Luís. / Prisma guidelines for systematic and scoping reviews : cultural mapping of creative industries. Proceedings of the 21st European Conference on Research Methodology for Business and Management Studies, ECRM 2022. editor / Manuel Au-Yong-Oliveira ; Carlos Costa. Reading : Academic Conferences and Publishing International Limited, 2022. pp. 216-219 (Proceedings of the European Conference on Research Methods in Business and Management Studies).

@inproceedings{2849a419d2814ac7b8fd2d525499b4e0,

title = "Prisma guidelines for systematic and scoping reviews: cultural mapping of creative industries",

abstract = "While policymakers have had a great interest in debating Cultural and Creative Industries (CCIs), there is a lack of literature presenting a systematic overview of existing relevant research regarding CCIs mapping. This paper discusses and compares PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines for Systematic Review (SR) and PRISMA for Scoping Review (ScR) for synthesizing research on CCIs mapping. {\textquoteleft}A systematic review attempts to collate all empirical evidence that fits pre-specified eligibility criteria to answer a specific research question. It uses explicit, systematic methods that are selected to minimize bias, thus providing reliable findings from which conclusions can be drawn and decisions made{\textquoteright} (Liberati et al. 2009: 65). ScR {\textquoteleft}(…) follow a systematic approach to map evidence on a topic and identify main concepts, theories, sources, and knowledge gaps{\textquoteright} (Tricco et al. 2018: 467). After analyzing and applying the guidelines and further documentation on both protocols, the ScR revealed to be more suitable in a complex field with distinct terminologies, production contexts, methodologies and objectives. Since certain topics in SR become optional, ScR is easier to apply in fields in which methods are difficult to compare and quantify, such as the Arts and Humanities.",

keywords = "PRISMA, Scoping review, Systematic review, Cultural mapping, Cultural and Creative Industries (CCIs)",

author = "Luana Santos and Sousa, {Ana Lu{\'i}sa} and Lu{\'i}s Teixeira",

note = "Funding Information: This article is a result of the project HAC4CG-Heritage, Art, Creation for Climate change. Living the city: catalyzing spaces for learning, creation and action towards climate change (NORTE-01-0145-FEDER-000067), supported by Norte Portugal Regional Operational Programme (NORTE 2020), under the PORTUGAL 2020 Partnership Agreement, through the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF). Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} The authors, 2021. All Rights Reserved.; 21st European Conference on Research Methodology for Business Management, ECRM 2022 ; Conference date: 02-06-2022 Through 03-06-2022",

year = "2022",

month = may,

day = "23",

doi = "10.34190/ecrm.21.1.272",

language = "English",

isbn = "9781914587368",

series = "Proceedings of the European Conference on Research Methods in Business and Management Studies",

publisher = "Academic Conferences and Publishing International Limited",

pages = "216--219",

editor = "Manuel Au-Yong-Oliveira and Carlos Costa",

booktitle = "Proceedings of the 21st European Conference on Research Methodology for Business and Management Studies, ECRM 2022",

address = "United Kingdom",

url = "https://www.academic-conferences.org/conferences/ecrm/ecrm-programme/",

}

Santos, L, Sousa, AL & Teixeira, L 2022, Prisma guidelines for systematic and scoping reviews: cultural mapping of creative industries. in M Au-Yong-Oliveira & C Costa (eds), Proceedings of the 21st European Conference on Research Methodology for Business and Management Studies, ECRM 2022. Proceedings of the European Conference on Research Methods in Business and Management Studies, vol. 2022-June, Academic Conferences and Publishing International Limited, Reading, pp. 216-219, 21st European Conference on Research Methodology for Business Management, Aveiro, Portugal, 2/06/22. https://doi.org/10.34190/ecrm.21.1.272

Prisma guidelines for systematic and scoping reviews: cultural mapping of creative industries. / Santos, Luana; Sousa, Ana Luísa; Teixeira, Luís.
Proceedings of the 21st European Conference on Research Methodology for Business and Management Studies, ECRM 2022. ed. / Manuel Au-Yong-Oliveira; Carlos Costa. Reading: Academic Conferences and Publishing International Limited, 2022. p. 216-219 (Proceedings of the European Conference on Research Methods in Business and Management Studies; Vol. 2022-June).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution › peer-review

TY - GEN

T1 - Prisma guidelines for systematic and scoping reviews

T2 - 21st European Conference on Research Methodology for Business Management

AU - Santos, Luana

AU - Sousa, Ana Luísa

AU - Teixeira, Luís

N1 - Funding Information: This article is a result of the project HAC4CG-Heritage, Art, Creation for Climate change. Living the city: catalyzing spaces for learning, creation and action towards climate change (NORTE-01-0145-FEDER-000067), supported by Norte Portugal Regional Operational Programme (NORTE 2020), under the PORTUGAL 2020 Partnership Agreement, through the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF). Publisher Copyright: © The authors, 2021. All Rights Reserved.

PY - 2022/5/23

Y1 - 2022/5/23

N2 - While policymakers have had a great interest in debating Cultural and Creative Industries (CCIs), there is a lack of literature presenting a systematic overview of existing relevant research regarding CCIs mapping. This paper discusses and compares PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines for Systematic Review (SR) and PRISMA for Scoping Review (ScR) for synthesizing research on CCIs mapping. ‘A systematic review attempts to collate all empirical evidence that fits pre-specified eligibility criteria to answer a specific research question. It uses explicit, systematic methods that are selected to minimize bias, thus providing reliable findings from which conclusions can be drawn and decisions made’ (Liberati et al. 2009: 65). ScR ‘(…) follow a systematic approach to map evidence on a topic and identify main concepts, theories, sources, and knowledge gaps’ (Tricco et al. 2018: 467). After analyzing and applying the guidelines and further documentation on both protocols, the ScR revealed to be more suitable in a complex field with distinct terminologies, production contexts, methodologies and objectives. Since certain topics in SR become optional, ScR is easier to apply in fields in which methods are difficult to compare and quantify, such as the Arts and Humanities.

AB - While policymakers have had a great interest in debating Cultural and Creative Industries (CCIs), there is a lack of literature presenting a systematic overview of existing relevant research regarding CCIs mapping. This paper discusses and compares PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines for Systematic Review (SR) and PRISMA for Scoping Review (ScR) for synthesizing research on CCIs mapping. ‘A systematic review attempts to collate all empirical evidence that fits pre-specified eligibility criteria to answer a specific research question. It uses explicit, systematic methods that are selected to minimize bias, thus providing reliable findings from which conclusions can be drawn and decisions made’ (Liberati et al. 2009: 65). ScR ‘(…) follow a systematic approach to map evidence on a topic and identify main concepts, theories, sources, and knowledge gaps’ (Tricco et al. 2018: 467). After analyzing and applying the guidelines and further documentation on both protocols, the ScR revealed to be more suitable in a complex field with distinct terminologies, production contexts, methodologies and objectives. Since certain topics in SR become optional, ScR is easier to apply in fields in which methods are difficult to compare and quantify, such as the Arts and Humanities.

KW - PRISMA

KW - Scoping review

KW - Systematic review

KW - Cultural mapping

KW - Cultural and Creative Industries (CCIs)

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85143295445&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.34190/ecrm.21.1.272

DO - 10.34190/ecrm.21.1.272

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:85143295445

SN - 9781914587368

T3 - Proceedings of the European Conference on Research Methods in Business and Management Studies

SP - 216

EP - 219

BT - Proceedings of the 21st European Conference on Research Methodology for Business and Management Studies, ECRM 2022

A2 - Au-Yong-Oliveira, Manuel

A2 - Costa, Carlos

PB - Academic Conferences and Publishing International Limited

CY - Reading

Y2 - 2 June 2022 through 3 June 2022

ER -

Santos L, Sousa AL, Teixeira L. Prisma guidelines for systematic and scoping reviews: cultural mapping of creative industries. In Au-Yong-Oliveira M, Costa C, editors, Proceedings of the 21st European Conference on Research Methodology for Business and Management Studies, ECRM 2022. Reading: Academic Conferences and Publishing International Limited. 2022. p. 216-219. (Proceedings of the European Conference on Research Methods in Business and Management Studies). doi: 10.34190/ecrm.21.1.272

Prisma guidelines for systematic and scoping reviews: cultural mapping of creative industries

Abstract

Publication series

Conference

Keywords

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

CITAR: Research Center for Science and Technology of the Arts

HAC4CG: Heritage Art, Creation for Climate Change - Living the City: Catalyzing Spaces for Learning, Creation and Action Towards Climate Change

Cite this

Prisma guidelines for systematic and scoping reviews: cultural mapping of creative industries

Abstract

Publication series

Conference

Keywords

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Projects

CITAR: Research Center for Science and Technology of the Arts

HAC4CG: Heritage Art, Creation for Climate Change - Living the City: Catalyzing Spaces for Learning, Creation and Action Towards Climate Change

Cite this