Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Prognostic impact of left ventricular reverse remodeling after surgical aortic valve replacement in severe aortic stenosis

  • Maria Rita Lima*
  • , João Abecasis
  • , Rita Reis Santos
  • , Sérgio Maltês
  • , Pedro Lopes
  • , Kamil Stankowski
  • , Sara Guerreiro
  • , António Ferreira
  • , Regina Ribeiras
  • , Maria João Andrade
  • , Márcio Madeira
  • , Sância Ramos
  • , Miguel Sousa Uva
  • , Nuno Cardim
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) is the treatment of choice for young patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS). Left ventricular (LV) reverse remodeling (RR) after surgery is expected to occur, even though its definition is largely heterogenous and ill-defined. However, LV RR not always occurs following afterload relief, and such may impact the prognosis. Single-centre prospective study including patients referred for SAVR due to severe symptomatic AS, with no previous history of ischemic cardiomyopathy. Both pre- and post-operative transthoracic echocardiographic (TTE) and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) study (at the 3rd to 6th month after SAVR) were performed. LV RR was defined when in presence of at least one of the imaging criteria: >15% decrease in end-diastolic volume (CMR); >15% decrease in LV indexed mass (CMR); >10% decrease in geometric remodeling (LV mass/EDV ratio) by CMR; >10% increase in LV ejection fraction (CMR); >50% increase on global longitudinal strain (TTE). We assess the prognostic value of RR definitions for the outcome after SAVR using Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier analysis. The primary endpoint was defined as all-cause mortality, heart failure (HF) hospitalization or worsening HF. We enrolled 140 patients – mean age 71 ± 9 years-old, 49% male, predominantly high-gradient-normal flow AS submitted to SAVR. At a mean follow-up of 34 ± 12 months, 16% patients met the primary endpoint, with an overall mortality rate of 6%. Twelve patients (9%) were admitted for HF and 7 (5%) had at least one episode of worsening HF. 118 patients had complete pre and post-surgery imaging study (mean follow-up: 36 ± 10 months): 103 patients (87%) met at least one RR parameter. Post-operative RR was not independently associated with the primary endpoint. LV mass regression was the sole predictor of the outcome. LV RR after SAVR is highly prevalent in a cohort of patients with classical severe symptomatic AS. However, only LV mass regression independently predicts the clinical outcome after surgery. LV structural remodeling, rather than functional improvement after surgery, may better define the prognosis after pressure overload relief.

Original languageEnglish
Article number26581
JournalScientific Reports
Volume15
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2025
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Cardiac magnetic resonance
  • Left ventricle hypertrophy
  • Left ventricle reverse remodeling
  • Severe aortic stenosis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Prognostic impact of left ventricular reverse remodeling after surgical aortic valve replacement in severe aortic stenosis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this