Abstract
Non-response in a 1983 re-interview of a 1952 random sample of Dutch sixth-graders is analysed with a probit model, relating non-response to family background, ability and school-related variables. Family background appears irrelevant, while ability and class failures have the expected effect. Differences between procedures for males and females (a follow-up interview on the mail survey for male non-respondents only) have no effect on structural relations. The selectivity bias term inserted in a simple wage equation has no significant effect.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 387-395 |
Number of pages | 9 |
Journal | Applied Economics |
Volume | 21 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Mar 1989 |
Externally published | Yes |