Systematic review of computerised cognitive remediation interventions in early psychosis: do we still need “somebody with a human touch”?

Alessia Avila*, Filipa Novais

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Purpose of the Review: Several computerized cognitive remediation (CCR) programs have been developed in recent years, although their efficacy in First Episode Psychosis (FEP) remains unclear, particularly regarding the benefits in terms of functional improvement. This review article provides a systematic evaluation of the efficacy, mechanisms, and implementation characteristics of CCR in FEP and critically reflects on the role of human supervision. Recent Findings: Studies indicates that CCR is effective in improving neurocognition. Evidence for the effects of CCR in social cognition remain less strong and delivery characteristics do not seem to influence this outcome. CCR showed some effects on both clinical symptoms and functional outcomes, with neurocognition being a strong mediator of improvement in social functioning. Summary: Computer-assisted CR programs can offer standardized, scalable interventions and are effective in improving neurocognition, even with limited supervision from trainers. Human supervision seems, however, crucial to ensuring proper development and transferring of skills to everyday functioning.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages14
JournalCurrent Treatment Options in Psychiatry
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 1 Aug 2024
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Computerised cognitive remediation
  • First episode psychosis
  • Functional outcomes
  • Therapist’s supervision

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Systematic review of computerised cognitive remediation interventions in early psychosis: do we still need “somebody with a human touch”?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this