Abstract
In this article, the authors discuss the cross-fertilisation between the Court of Justice of the European Union and the European Court of Human Rightsto re-evaluate the major promises of theLeave Campaign, namely parliamentary sovereignty and immigration control. The authors also analyse the potential of such cross-fertilisation for the development—or regress—of international human rights. In particular, the authors point out that the interplay between the two courts would lead to continued leverage of the Luxembourg Court and EU law on British human rights practicesthrough the binding force of the European Convention on Human Rights and the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights. Meanwhile, the authors also highlight the importance of protecting the Strasbourg Court from attacks on its legitimacy and desirability that fuelled the momentum for Brexit and the challenge to the European Court of Justice’s jurisdiction over the United Kingdom.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 567-577 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| Journal | European human rights law review |
| Issue number | 6 |
| Publication status | Published - 2018 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- Brexit
- European court of human rights
- European court of justice
- Human rights
- Immigration policy
- Parliamentary sovereignty
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The cross-fertilisation between the Court of Justice of the European Union and the European Court of human rights: reframing the discussion on Brexit'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver