The Huawei case and its aftermath: a new test for a new type of abuse

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)
13 Downloads

Abstract

Competition law sets limits on the exercise of intellectual property rights by dominant companies, namely in cases involving standard essential patents (SEPs). This article will examine the framework for SEP owners’ right to seek an injunction, discussing competitive problems that such situations may cause as well as the solutions adopted by the European Institutions, comparing them with the US and Japanese approach, and finally reflecting upon the opportunity for a new test for a new type of abuse. Although the three legal orders – US, EU and Japan – apply different laws establishing a general presumption against injunctions in SEPs encumbered with FRAND commitments, their goal is the same: to protect the interest of the SEP holder to obtain a remuneration without an abusive recourse to injunctions. I will argue that, in the EU, the Huaweicase created a new test for a new type of abuse, improving the comprehensibility and certainty for the companies involved in standardization across Europe and allowing the harmonization of national judicial solutions regarding the seeking of injunctions in the SEPs context. In spite of some uncertainties, the new test clarifies the role that competition rules should play in cases of abuses by SEPs owners.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)11-31
Number of pages21
JournalYearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies
Volume10
Issue number16
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Keywords

  • Abuse of dominant position
  • FRAND commitments
  • Seeking an injunction
  • Standard essential patents
  • Willing licensee

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Huawei case and its aftermath: a new test for a new type of abuse'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this