The impact on domestic law of climate change-related advisory opinions: the experience of the IACtHR and the ITLOS

Gáston Medici-Colombo, Armando Rocha

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

Abstract

As advisory opinions clarify States’ obligations under international law, it is natural that domestic measures aimed at complying with such obligations need to be re-assessed in light of those advisory opinions, regardless of their non-binding character. This chapter looks to the stance taken by the IACtHR itself on the domestic impact of its opinions and to the case law of domestic courts on this matter, although mindful that States may have changed, or need to change, their domestic laws after, and consequential to, an IACtHR’s opinion. In the analysis of the advisory opinions of the ITLOS, this chapter looks very briefly at the adoption of domestic legislation after the rendering of its opinions. This chapter does not assess the experience related to the ICJ’s opinions.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationThe role of advisory opinions in international law in the context of the climate crisis
EditorsArmando Rocha, Maria Antónia Tigre
Place of PublicationBoston
PublisherBrill Nijhoff
Chapter12
Pages306-325
Number of pages20
ISBN (Electronic)9789004730618
ISBN (Print)9789004730601
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 23 Jun 2025

Publication series

NameNijhoff Law Specials
Volume112
ISSN (Electronic)0924-4549

Keywords

  • Advisory opinions
  • Compliance
  • Control of conventionality
  • Enforcement
  • Execution
  • Implementation
  • Inter-American court of human rights
  • International Tribunal for the law of the sea

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The impact on domestic law of climate change-related advisory opinions: the experience of the IACtHR and the ITLOS'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this