TY - JOUR
T1 - The meaning making model applied to community-dwelling adults with chronic pain
AU - Ferreira-Valente, Alexandra
AU - Fontes, Fernando
AU - Pais-Ribeiro, José
AU - Jensen, Mark P.
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors gratefully acknowledge the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology for AFV’s FCT post-doctoral grant (SFRH/BPD/121452/2016), FF’s Contract under the Transitory Norm (DL57/2016/ CP1341/CT0007) and the William James Center for Research (UIDB/04810/2020). The authors also acknowledge Joy Chan, Sam Battalio, and Emily Stensland for their support in the conduction of the focus groups, Patrícia Costa Pinto for her support in the generation of initial codes of thematic analysis, and Pedro Costa for critically reviewing the manuscript.
Funding Information:
Alexandra Ferreira-Valente reports a grant from the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology,
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Ferreira-Valente et al.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Purpose: Chronic pain is a multidimensional experience that is influenced by biological, psychological, social, and spiritual factors. The Meaning Making Model is a recent cognitive behavioral model that has been developed to understand how psychosocial factors influence adjustment to stressful events, such as having a chronic illness. This qualitative study aims to understand the potential utility of this model for understanding the role of meaning making in adjustment to chronic pain. Materials and Methods: Eighteen community-dwelling adults with chronic low back pain or chronic pain due to osteoarthritis participated in four focus groups. Participants were asked open-ended questions about their pain experience, pain-related beliefs, meaning of pain, and the perceived association between pain and their meaning in life and sense of purpose. Data were submitted to thematic analysis and the identified themes were considered in light of the Meaning Making Model. Results: Three overarching themes emerged, each of which included two themes. The first overarching theme – “appraised meaning of pain” – included the themes “causal attributions” and “primary appraisals.” The second – “meaning making processes” – included the themes “assimilation” and “accommodation.” The third – “meanings made” – included the themes “pain as an opportunity” and “acceptance.” Conclusion: The key themes that emerged as individuals with chronic pain discussed pain and its impact are consistent with those that would be hypothesized as important from the Meaning Making Model, providing preliminary support for the utility of this model in the context of chronic pain. People with chronic pain appear to appraise pain in terms of its cause, controllability, threat, loss, or challenge. When a discrepancy between the appraised meaning of pain and one’s global meaning emerged, participants engaged in meaning making processes (accommodation and assimilation), resulting in meanings made, such as a reappraised meaning of pain, perceptions of growth, and acceptance.
AB - Purpose: Chronic pain is a multidimensional experience that is influenced by biological, psychological, social, and spiritual factors. The Meaning Making Model is a recent cognitive behavioral model that has been developed to understand how psychosocial factors influence adjustment to stressful events, such as having a chronic illness. This qualitative study aims to understand the potential utility of this model for understanding the role of meaning making in adjustment to chronic pain. Materials and Methods: Eighteen community-dwelling adults with chronic low back pain or chronic pain due to osteoarthritis participated in four focus groups. Participants were asked open-ended questions about their pain experience, pain-related beliefs, meaning of pain, and the perceived association between pain and their meaning in life and sense of purpose. Data were submitted to thematic analysis and the identified themes were considered in light of the Meaning Making Model. Results: Three overarching themes emerged, each of which included two themes. The first overarching theme – “appraised meaning of pain” – included the themes “causal attributions” and “primary appraisals.” The second – “meaning making processes” – included the themes “assimilation” and “accommodation.” The third – “meanings made” – included the themes “pain as an opportunity” and “acceptance.” Conclusion: The key themes that emerged as individuals with chronic pain discussed pain and its impact are consistent with those that would be hypothesized as important from the Meaning Making Model, providing preliminary support for the utility of this model in the context of chronic pain. People with chronic pain appear to appraise pain in terms of its cause, controllability, threat, loss, or challenge. When a discrepancy between the appraised meaning of pain and one’s global meaning emerged, participants engaged in meaning making processes (accommodation and assimilation), resulting in meanings made, such as a reappraised meaning of pain, perceptions of growth, and acceptance.
KW - Chronic pain
KW - Meaning in life
KW - Meaning of pain
KW - Thematic analysis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85111916442&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2147/JPR.S308607
DO - 10.2147/JPR.S308607
M3 - Article
C2 - 34349554
AN - SCOPUS:85111916442
SN - 1178-7090
VL - 14
SP - 2295
EP - 2311
JO - Journal of Pain Research
JF - Journal of Pain Research
ER -